DOI 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.01.097
Single-Center Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Experience of Foramen Magnum Neurenteric Cyst: Report of 6 Cases and Brief Review of the Literature.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
To retrospectively analyze the clinical data of 6 patients with foramen magnum (FM) neurenteric (NE) cysts, and summarize the clinical characteristics and treatment experience for this rare disease in our single center.
METHODS
Between January 2011 and December 2015, 6 patients with FM NE cyst were surgically treated at Xuan Wu Hospital of Capital Medical University. We summarize the treatment experience of these patients through a retrospective review of the clinical information, imaging features, surgical details, and follow-up outcomes.
RESULTS
All 6 patients were female, ranging in age from 15 to 54 years (mean age, 36.8 ± 12.9 years). Occipital headache along with cranial nerve injury were the most common symptoms. Preoperative brain magnetic resonance imaging identified all lesions in the FM region, with an oblong or lobulated shape. The surgical approach was far lateral in 4 patients and suboccipital midline in 2 patients. Total lesion removal was completed in 4 patients, and subtotal excision was performed in the other 2 patients, in whom the cyst wall was intensely adherent to surrounding structures. In all 6 patients, the preoperative symptoms were significantly relieved after surgery. No recurrence was seen after a mean follow-up of 27.3 months (range, 3-70 months).
CONCLUSIONS
Our present study identified a female predominance among patients with intracranial FM NE cyst. Surgical excision is the optimum treatment strategy for this rare disease. Our findings indicate that subtotal removal of an FM NE cyst may be associated with favorable outcomes, but strict long-term follow up is needed.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.