The Coverage of Soft-Tissue Defects Around the Foot and Ankle Using Free or Local Flaps: A Comparative Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to compare the reconstructive outcomes of soft-tissue defects around foot and ankle with local or free flaps and attempt to provide an optimal strategy for these patients in comparison with the conventional guidelines.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all continuous patients with foot and ankle reconstruction using different flaps from 2010 to 2018 was performed. Based on the flap types, the patients were divided into 2 groups: local flap group and free flap group. Outcomes were assessed according to the flap survival rate, recipient complications, aesthetic outcomes, and donor-site complications.

RESULT: A total of 130 flaps including 47 free flaps and 83 local flaps were collected. There was no difference in flap survival rate between the 2 groups; however, a significant difference in aesthetic outcomes was noted between them: the free flap group presented a better overall aesthetic outcomes in comparison with the local flap group in terms of color and contour match. Moreover, local flaps had more donor-site morbidities including the need for skin grafting and wound infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Free flaps in wound coverage of foot and ankle can achieve better outcomes than local flaps in terms of recipient benefits and donor-site compromise with a comparable flap survival rate.