Revista alergia Mexico (Tecamachalco, Puebla, Mexico : 1993) · 2018
[Chlorhexidine anaphylaxis in a perioperative context: diagnosis and management].
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Calle Ana, Guevara-Saldaña Liliana, Cardona Ricardo
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: During surgery, the patient is exposed to multiple medications and molecules that can be associated with the development hypersensitivity, which makes it difficult to detect the causative agent of a perioperative reaction and makes it necessary to perform allergy tests.
CASE REPORT: 53-year-old man who after a right knee arthroscopy was administered intravenous ketorolac; at 12 minutes, a pruriginous rash appeared on the chest, abdomen and limbs; infusion of the drug was immediately stopped and 100 mg intravenous hydrocortisone were administered. At 15 minutes, the patient experienced bilateral angioedema of the eyelids and a sensation of breathlessness, and oxygen was therefore administered, as well as 2 mg intravenous clemastine, 5 mg intravenous ranitidine and 20 µg subcutaneous adrenaline. Epidermal tests with 0.5 % chlorhexidine and serum chlorhexidine-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) were performed, both with positive results. The patient recovered without complications; at discharge, he was prescribed intramuscular etofenamate.
CONCLUSION: Perioperative anaphylaxis is a rare, but potentially fatal event. Proper identification of the drug or substance responsible for the reaction by using allergy tests decreases unnecessary pharmacological restrictions and avoids re-exposure.
CASE REPORT: 53-year-old man who after a right knee arthroscopy was administered intravenous ketorolac; at 12 minutes, a pruriginous rash appeared on the chest, abdomen and limbs; infusion of the drug was immediately stopped and 100 mg intravenous hydrocortisone were administered. At 15 minutes, the patient experienced bilateral angioedema of the eyelids and a sensation of breathlessness, and oxygen was therefore administered, as well as 2 mg intravenous clemastine, 5 mg intravenous ranitidine and 20 µg subcutaneous adrenaline. Epidermal tests with 0.5 % chlorhexidine and serum chlorhexidine-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) were performed, both with positive results. The patient recovered without complications; at discharge, he was prescribed intramuscular etofenamate.
CONCLUSION: Perioperative anaphylaxis is a rare, but potentially fatal event. Proper identification of the drug or substance responsible for the reaction by using allergy tests decreases unnecessary pharmacological restrictions and avoids re-exposure.