MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/sla.0000000000000954

Медицинская библиотека · Annals of surgery · 2014

Multicenter double-blinded randomized controlled trial of standard abdominal wound edge protection with surgical dressings versus coverage with a sterile circular polyethylene drape for prevention of surgical site infections: a CHIR-Net trial (BaFO; NCT01181206).

Mihaljevic André L, Schirren Rebekka, Özer Mine, Ottl Stephanie, Grün Sybille, Michalski Christoph W, Erkan Mert, Jäger Carsten, Reiser-Erkan Carolin, Kehl Victoria, Schuster Tibor, Roder Jürgen, Clauer Ulf, Orlitsch Carolin, Hoffmann Tomas F, Lange Reinhard, Harzenetter Thomas, Steiner Phillip, Michalski Milena, Henkel Karl, Stadler Josef, Pistorius Georg A, Jahn Anja, Obermaier Robert, Unger Robert, Strunk Roland, Willeke Frank, Vogelsang Holger, Halve Bert, Dietl Karl-Heinz, Hilgenstock Hendrik, Meyer Alexander, Krämling Hans-Jörg, Wagner Markus, Schoenberg Michael H, Zeller Florian, Schmidt Johannes, Friess Helmut, Kleeff Jörg

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether circular plastic wound edge protectors (CWEPs) significantly reduce the rate of surgical site infections (SSIs) in comparison to standard surgical towels in patients undergoing laparotomy.

BACKGROUND

SSIs cause substantial morbidity, prolonged hospitalization, and costs and remain one of the most frequent surgical complications. CWEPs have been proposed as a measure to reduce the incidence of SSIs.

METHODS

In this randomized controlled, multicenter, 2-arm, parallel-group design, patient- and observer-blinded trial patients undergoing open elective abdominal surgery were assigned to either intraoperative wound coverage with a CWEP or standard coverage with surgical towels. Primary endpoint was superiority of intervention over control in terms of the incidence of SSIs within a 30-day postoperative period.

RESULTS

Between September 2010 and November 2012, 608 patients undergoing laparotomy were randomized at 16 centers across Germany. Three patients in the device group and 11 patients in the control group did not undergo laparotomy. Patients' and procedural characteristics were well balanced between the 2 groups. Forty-eight patients discontinued the study prematurely, mainly because of relaparotomy (control, n=9; intervention, n=9) and death (control, n=4; intervention, n=7). A total of 79 patients experienced SSIs within 30 days of surgery, 27 of 274 (9.9%) in the device group and 52 of 272 (19.1%) in the control group (odds ratio=0.462, 95% confidence interval: 0.281-0.762; P=0.002). Subgroup analyses indicate that the effect could be more pronounced in colorectal surgery, and in clean-contaminated/contaminated surgeries.

CONCLUSIONS

Our trial shows that CWEPs are effective at reducing the incidence of SSIs in elective and clean or clean-contaminated open abdominal surgery.

Для цитирования: Mihaljevic André L, Schirren Rebekka, Özer Mine, Ottl Stephanie, Grün Sybille, Michalski Christoph W, Erkan Mert, Jäger Carsten, Reiser-Erkan Carolin, Kehl Victoria, Schuster Tibor, Roder Jürgen, Clauer Ulf, Orlitsch Carolin, Hoffmann Tomas F, Lange Reinhard, Harzenetter Thomas, Steiner Phillip, Michalski Milena, Henkel Karl, Stadler Josef, Pistorius Georg A, Jahn Anja, Obermaier Robert, Unger Robert, Strunk Roland, Willeke Frank, Vogelsang Holger, Halve Bert, Dietl Karl-Heinz, Hilgenstock Hendrik, Meyer Alexander, Krämling Hans-Jörg, Wagner Markus, Schoenberg Michael H, Zeller Florian, Schmidt Johannes, Friess Helmut, Kleeff Jörg. Multicenter double-blinded randomized controlled trial of standard abdominal wound edge protection with surgical dressings versus coverage with a sterile circular polyethylene drape for prevention of surgical site infections: a CHIR-Net trial (BaFO; NCT01181206).. Annals of surgery. 2014. DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000000954.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.