Surviving Sepsis After Burn Campaign.
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Greenhalgh David G, Hill David M, Burmeister David M, Gus Eduardo I, Cleland Heather, Padiglione Alex, Holden Dane, Huss Fredrik, Chew Michelle S, Kubasiak John C, Burrell Aidan, Manzanares William, Gómez María Chacón, Yoshimura Yuya, Sjöberg Folke, Xie Wei-Guo, Egipto Paula, Lavrentieva Athina, Jain Arpana, Miranda-Altamirano Ariel, Raby Ed, Aramendi Ignacio, Sen Soman, Chung Kevin K, Alvarez Renata Jennifer Quintana, Han Chunmao, Matsushima Asako, Elmasry Moustafa, Liu Yan, Donoso Carlos Segovia, Bolgiani Alberto, Johnson Laura S, Vana Luiz Philipe Molina, de Romero Rosario Valdez Duval, Allorto Nikki, Abesamis Gerald, Luna Virginia Nuñez, Gragnani Alfredo, González Carolina Bonilla, Basilico Hugo, Wood Fiona, Jeng James, Li Andrew, Singer Mervyn, Luo Gaoxing, Palmieri Tina, Kahn Steven, Joe Victor, Cartotto Robert
Аннотация
METHODS: The International Society for Burn Injuries (ISBI) reached out to regional or national burn organizations to recommend members to participate in the program. Two members of the ISBI developed specific "patient/population, intervention, comparison and outcome" (PICO) questions that paralleled the 2021 Surviving Sepsis Campaign [1]. SSABC participants were asked to search the current literature and rate its quality for each topic. At the Congress of the ISBI, in Guadalajara, Mexico, August 28, 2022, a majority of the participants met to create "statements" based on the literature. The "summary statements" were then sent to all members for comment with the hope of developing an 80% consensus. After four reviews, a consensus statement for each topic was created or "no consensus" was reported.
RESULTS: The committee developed sixty statements within fourteen topics that provide guidance for the early treatment of sepsis in burn patients. These statements should be used to improve the care of sepsis in burn patients. The statements should not be considered as "static" comments but should rather be used as guidelines for future testing of the best treatments for sepsis in burn patients. They should be updated on a regular basis.
CONCLUSION: Members of the burn community from the around the world have developed the Surviving Sepsis After Burn Campaign guidelines with the goal of improving the outcome of sepsis in burn patients.