Surgery · 2003
Intraoperative parathyroid hormone assay and parathyroid reoperations.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sebag Frederic, Shen W, Brunaud L, Kebebew E, Duh Quan-Yang, Clark Orlo H
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine whether intraoperative parathyroid hormone (IOPTH) assay improved results of reoperations.
METHODS: One hundred two patients with persistent/recurrent sporadic primary hyperparathyroidism underwent 108 reoperations (1996-2002). IOPTH was not used (n=58) from 1996-1998 (group 1). IOPTH was used (n=50) from 1999-2002 (group 2). Sensitivity and positive predictive value of IOPTH and its influence on surgical strategy were analyzed. A 50% decrease occurring 10 minutes after removal of parathyroid tumor was used to determine if all abnormal tissue had been removed.
RESULTS: Groups 1 (58 patients) and 2 (50 patients) were comparable except for duration of follow-up. The cure rate was 84% (group 1, 87%; group 2, 82%, P=0.7). Hypocalcemia developed in 20 patients (permanent in 2 patients). There was 1 permanent vocal cord paralysis and 1 patient died of toxic shock syndrome. IOPTH successfully predicted cure in 44 of 49 patients (sensitivity, 90%); the positive predictive value was 90%. Values for parathyroid hormone level and the ratio parathyroid hormone/calcium at day 1 were at least as accurate as IOPTH in predicting cure. IOPTH was helpful in 1 patient but misleading in 4 patients. It failed to modify intraoperative strategy in most other patients.
CONCLUSIONS: IOPTH testing was relatively reliable in patients with persistent or recurrent sporadic primary hyperparathyroidism, but the test unfortunately failed to improve the overall success rate at reoperation.
METHODS: One hundred two patients with persistent/recurrent sporadic primary hyperparathyroidism underwent 108 reoperations (1996-2002). IOPTH was not used (n=58) from 1996-1998 (group 1). IOPTH was used (n=50) from 1999-2002 (group 2). Sensitivity and positive predictive value of IOPTH and its influence on surgical strategy were analyzed. A 50% decrease occurring 10 minutes after removal of parathyroid tumor was used to determine if all abnormal tissue had been removed.
RESULTS: Groups 1 (58 patients) and 2 (50 patients) were comparable except for duration of follow-up. The cure rate was 84% (group 1, 87%; group 2, 82%, P=0.7). Hypocalcemia developed in 20 patients (permanent in 2 patients). There was 1 permanent vocal cord paralysis and 1 patient died of toxic shock syndrome. IOPTH successfully predicted cure in 44 of 49 patients (sensitivity, 90%); the positive predictive value was 90%. Values for parathyroid hormone level and the ratio parathyroid hormone/calcium at day 1 were at least as accurate as IOPTH in predicting cure. IOPTH was helpful in 1 patient but misleading in 4 patients. It failed to modify intraoperative strategy in most other patients.
CONCLUSIONS: IOPTH testing was relatively reliable in patients with persistent or recurrent sporadic primary hyperparathyroidism, but the test unfortunately failed to improve the overall success rate at reoperation.