Significance and Surgical Options for Nontranssexual Phalloplasty: A Retrospective Single-Center Analysis of 166 Patients.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of phalloplasty and explore the clinical significance and selection of methods for penile reconstruction.

METHODS

The same surgical team performed primary phalloplasty in 166 nontranssexual patients using different surgical approaches between September 2000 and September 2020. All patients had at least 6 months of follow-up. Surgical techniques, complications, and outcomes were retrospectively recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 166 patients with indications such as penile trauma (n = 68 [41%]), amputation injury (n = 15 [9%]), iatrogenic (n = 13 [8%]), penile aplasia (n = 54 [32%]), genital ambiguity (n = 15 [9%]), and Peyronie disease (n = 1 [0.6%]) underwent different techniques of phalloplasty. Four patients (2.4%) had total flap necrosis, and 17 (10%) had partial flap necrosis. The total urethral complications rate was 32.5% (54 of 166); however, all the patients were able to void while standing after successful corrective surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Individualized selection of appropriate penile reconstruction methods tailored to the cause of penile defect, patients' personal needs, thickness of donor site, and the blood supply of the flap are conducive to achieving satisfactory treatment results, reducing complications, and improving patient satisfaction. We believe that a scapular flap has certain advantages in nontranssexual patients, whereas other flaps also have their own indications.