Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2021
Hamstrings Muscle Morphology After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
МетаанализСистематический обзорСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sherman David A, Rush Justin L, Glaviano Neal R, Norte Grant E
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Hamstrings muscle morphology is determinant of muscle function (i.e. strength). Among individuals with ACL reconstruction (ACLR), less cross-sectional area (CSA) and volume in the ACLR-limb are associated with muscle weakness, and may contribute to lower rates of return to preinjury activity level and an increased risk for long-term sequelae.
OBJECTIVES: To effectively treat muscular impairments, an accurate understanding of differences in hamstrings morphology following ACLR is needed. A systematic review and meta-analysis were undertaken to describe the morphology of the hamstring muscle complex after ACLR.
METHODS: We searched five databases for studies evaluating the difference between hamstrings size and architecture in individuals with ACLR. Two independent reviewers assessed each paper for inclusion and quality. Means and standard deviations were extracted from each included study to allow fixed-effect size meta-analysis calculations for comparison of results.
RESULTS: Twenty-four studies were included for final review. Eight categories of morphological outcomes were identified, and studies were grouped accordingly: (1) volume, (2) cross-sectional area (CSA), (3) muscle length, (4) muscle thickness, (5) fascicle length, (6) pennation angle, (7) fiber area, and (8) fiber type. Meta-analysis demonstrated lower hamstrings volume in the ACLR-limb in both contralateral and control group comparisons, and lower CSA, length, and thickness in the ACLR-limb in contralateral comparisons. The semitendinosus and gracilis were most profoundly impacted. Limited moderate evidence demonstrated greater biceps femoris pennation angle in the ACLR-limb.
CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with ACLR demonstrated large deficits in semitendinosus and gracilis muscle CSA and volume in the ACLR-limb compared contralaterally, with no differences observed in the biceps femoris or semimembranosus. Clinical implications regarding assessment and treatment of individuals with ACLR are discussed.
OBJECTIVES: To effectively treat muscular impairments, an accurate understanding of differences in hamstrings morphology following ACLR is needed. A systematic review and meta-analysis were undertaken to describe the morphology of the hamstring muscle complex after ACLR.
METHODS: We searched five databases for studies evaluating the difference between hamstrings size and architecture in individuals with ACLR. Two independent reviewers assessed each paper for inclusion and quality. Means and standard deviations were extracted from each included study to allow fixed-effect size meta-analysis calculations for comparison of results.
RESULTS: Twenty-four studies were included for final review. Eight categories of morphological outcomes were identified, and studies were grouped accordingly: (1) volume, (2) cross-sectional area (CSA), (3) muscle length, (4) muscle thickness, (5) fascicle length, (6) pennation angle, (7) fiber area, and (8) fiber type. Meta-analysis demonstrated lower hamstrings volume in the ACLR-limb in both contralateral and control group comparisons, and lower CSA, length, and thickness in the ACLR-limb in contralateral comparisons. The semitendinosus and gracilis were most profoundly impacted. Limited moderate evidence demonstrated greater biceps femoris pennation angle in the ACLR-limb.
CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with ACLR demonstrated large deficits in semitendinosus and gracilis muscle CSA and volume in the ACLR-limb compared contralaterally, with no differences observed in the biceps femoris or semimembranosus. Clinical implications regarding assessment and treatment of individuals with ACLR are discussed.