Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS · 2025
Technical skills assessment during simulated cleft lip repair.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kaimi Pegi, Fisher David M, Yasabala Branavan, Wong Riff Karen W, Podolsky Dale J
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Cleft lip repair is a challenging procedure with a steep learning curve. A cleft lip simulator can augment the operating experience to shorten the learning curve. This study evaluated the efficacy of a high-fidelity cleft lip simulator using a newly developed cleft lip technical assessment tool.
METHODS: Four plastic surgery residents and 6 fellows performed 3 sequential cleft lip repairs. Three staff surgeons performed 1 cleft lip repair. Each procedure was video recorded and assessed by 3 staff cleft surgeons using a newly developed cleft lip technical assessment scale and a previously developed global rating scale. The reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]) of the assessment scores was determined. The first simulation session was compared among participants to determine whether the scales and simulator could distinguish between skill level. Learning curves were determined using successive assessment scores among the trainees.
RESULTS: The average ICC for the cleft lip-specific and global scores were 0.72 (range 0.65-0.82) and 0.70 (range 0.60-0.79), respectively. All scale items demonstrated statistically significant interrater reliability. The staff surgeons significantly outperformed the trainees in the first simulation session for both assessment scores (p < 0.05). The trainees demonstrated improved performance after each session.
CONCLUSIONS: A cleft lip assessment scale was developed and found to be reliable at evaluating technical skill in simulated cleft lip repair. Repeated use of the cleft lip simulator improved performance in simulated cleft lip repair.
METHODS: Four plastic surgery residents and 6 fellows performed 3 sequential cleft lip repairs. Three staff surgeons performed 1 cleft lip repair. Each procedure was video recorded and assessed by 3 staff cleft surgeons using a newly developed cleft lip technical assessment scale and a previously developed global rating scale. The reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]) of the assessment scores was determined. The first simulation session was compared among participants to determine whether the scales and simulator could distinguish between skill level. Learning curves were determined using successive assessment scores among the trainees.
RESULTS: The average ICC for the cleft lip-specific and global scores were 0.72 (range 0.65-0.82) and 0.70 (range 0.60-0.79), respectively. All scale items demonstrated statistically significant interrater reliability. The staff surgeons significantly outperformed the trainees in the first simulation session for both assessment scores (p < 0.05). The trainees demonstrated improved performance after each session.
CONCLUSIONS: A cleft lip assessment scale was developed and found to be reliable at evaluating technical skill in simulated cleft lip repair. Repeated use of the cleft lip simulator improved performance in simulated cleft lip repair.