Computed tomography based scoring system in a prospectively ascertained cohort of patients with chronic pancreatitis.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
No standardized system is currently used to report the presence or severity of parenchymal and ductal features of chronic pancreatitis (CP) on CT scan. We report a modification to the previously proposed Cambridge classification to serve this purpose.
METHODS
Contrast-enhanced CT scans of 158 well-phenotyped patients with CP enrolled in the North American Pancreatitis Studies (NAPS2) during 2000-2014 from the University of Pittsburgh were retrospectively reviewed by a subspecialty trained abdominal radiologist. Presence and severity (score scale 0-4) of pancreatic duct (PD) dilation, obstruction and contour irregularity, pancreatic calcifications, atrophy and extent of pancreatic involvement were recorded to grade the morphological severity of CP and stratify patients into distinct morphologic patterns. Findings were also correlated with clinical features.
RESULTS
Pancreatic atrophy, calcifications, PD dilation and PD irregularity were observed in 80%, 68%, 65%, 58% cases, respectively. An obstructive stone or PD stricture was present in 63%, and 86% had diffuse pancreatic involvement. Using these features, CP was noted to be moderate or severe in 61%, and classified morphologically as obstructive with/without calcifications, calcific but non-obstructive and non-calcific/non-obstructive in 65%, 20%, 15%, respectively. Functional abnormalities but not the presence of pain generally correlated with imaging findings.
CONCLUSION
A structured scoring system can provide qualitative and quantitative assessment of imaging findings in CP and an opportunity for adoption into clinical practice and research for initial evaluation and longitudinal follow-up. Our findings need validation in a prospective cohort before widespread adoption.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.