MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3389/fmed.2026.1787075

Медицинская библиотека · Frontiers in medicine · 2026

ABC'S of AI: proposing a clinician's framework for the interpretation of artificial intelligence studies.

Murray Brian, Bauer Seth R, Gao Yanjun, Barreto Erin F, Henry Kelli, Blotske Kaitlin, Sikora Andrea

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning have emerged as transformative analytic methods capable of identifying patterns and proposing treatment strategies from complex, heterogeneous data generated in patient care settings. However, translating reports of AI tools into clinical decision-making requires careful interpretation and contextualization. Here, we present a structured framework (ABCDEFG framework) for clinicians to critically appraise studies reporting AI tools using a high-profile reinforcement learning analysis of vasopressin initiation in septic shock as a case example. We highlight key methodological strengths including adherence to reporting standards, alignment with clinical outcomes, and external validation. We also identify limitations related to causal inference, reward structure design, assumptions about state representation, and implementation readiness. Our framework emphasizes the importance of rigorous, clinically grounded critique before integrating AI tools into practice, and provides a roadmap for clinicians to assess the reliability and relevance of emerging AI-based decision support.

Для цитирования: Murray Brian, Bauer Seth R, Gao Yanjun, Barreto Erin F, Henry Kelli, Blotske Kaitlin, Sikora Andrea. ABC'S of AI: proposing a clinician's framework for the interpretation of artificial intelligence studies.. Frontiers in medicine. 2026. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2026.1787075.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.