MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002360

Медицинская библиотека · The American journal of gastroenterology · 2023

Poliprotect vs Omeprazole in the Relief of Heartburn, Epigastric Pain, and Burning in Patients Without Erosive Esophagitis and Gastroduodenal Lesions: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.

Corazziari Enrico Stefano, Gasbarrini Antonio, D'Alba Lucia, D'Ovidio Valeria, Riggio Oliviero, Passaretti Sandro, Annibale Bruno, Cicala Michele, Repici Alessandro, Bassotti Gabrio, Ciacci Carolina, Di Sabatino Antonio, Neri Matteo, Bragazzi Maria Consiglia, Ribichini Emanuela, Radocchia Giulia, Iovino Paola, Marazzato Massimiliano, Schippa Serena, Badiali Danilo

Рандомизированное исследованиеМногоцентровое исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

In the treatment of upper GI endoscopy-negative patients with heartburn and epigastric pain or burning, antacids, antireflux agents, and mucosal protective agents are widely used, alone or as add-on treatment, to increase response to proton-pump inhibitors, which are not indicated in infancy and pregnancy and account for significant cost expenditure.

METHODS

In this randomized, controlled, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter trial assessing the efficacy and safety of mucosal protective agent Poliprotect (neoBianacid, Sansepolcro, Italy) vs omeprazole in the relief of heartburn and epigastric pain/burning, 275 endoscopy-negative outpatients were given a 4-week treatment with omeprazole (20 mg q.d.) or Poliprotect (5 times a day for the initial 2 weeks and on demand thereafter), followed by an open-label 4-week treatment period with Poliprotect on-demand. Gut microbiota change was assessed.

RESULTS

A 2-week treatment with Poliprotect proved noninferior to omeprazole for symptom relief (between-group difference in the change in visual analog scale symptom score: [mean, 95% confidence interval] -5.4, -9.9 to -0.1; -6.2, -10.8 to -1.6; intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations, respectively). Poliprotect's benefit remained unaltered after shifting to on-demand intake, with no gut microbiota variation. The initial benefit of omeprazole was maintained against significantly higher use of rescue medicine sachets (mean, 95% confidence interval: Poliprotect 3.9, 2.8-5.0; omeprazole 8.2, 4.8-11.6) and associated with an increased abundance of oral cavity genera in the intestinal microbiota. No relevant adverse events were reported in either treatment arm.

DISCUSSION: Poliprotect proved noninferior to standard-dose omeprazole in symptomatic patients with heartburn/epigastric burning without erosive esophagitis and gastroduodenal lesions. Gut microbiota was not affected by Poliprotect treatment. The study is registered in Clinicaltrial.gov (NCT03238534) and the EudraCT database (2015-005216-15).

Для цитирования: Corazziari Enrico Stefano, Gasbarrini Antonio, D'Alba Lucia, D'Ovidio Valeria, Riggio Oliviero, Passaretti Sandro, Annibale Bruno, Cicala Michele, Repici Alessandro, Bassotti Gabrio, Ciacci Carolina, Di Sabatino Antonio, Neri Matteo, Bragazzi Maria Consiglia, Ribichini Emanuela, Radocchia Giulia, Iovino Paola, Marazzato Massimiliano, Schippa Serena, Badiali Danilo. Poliprotect vs Omeprazole in the Relief of Heartburn, Epigastric Pain, and Burning in Patients Without Erosive Esophagitis and Gastroduodenal Lesions: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.. The American journal of gastroenterology. 2023. DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002360.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.