Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2026
Surveillance Strategies for Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders: A Comprehensive Review and Clinical Decision Tree.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mortazavi Hamed, Beigzadeh Jalali Abolfazl
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Oral potentially malignant disorders are a group of oral mucosal conditions with a significant risk of transforming into oral squamous cell carcinoma. Early detection and proper follow-up are crucial in improving patient outcomes. This review consolidates evidence on the clinical features, malignant potential, treatment, and follow-up strategies for the four most common oral potentially malignant disorders: oral leukoplakia, proliferative verrucous leukoplakia, erythroplakia, and oral lichen planus. It also proposes a clinical decision tree for structured surveillance of these lesions.
METHODS: This review consolidates evidence on the clinical features, malignant potential, treatment, and follow-up strategies for the four most common oral potentially malignant disorders.
RESULTS: This review highlights the variability in follow-up recommendations and emphasizes the need for individualized, evidence-informed monitoring strategies.
CONCLUSION: To the best of our knowledge, this is among the first structured attempts to present a comprehensive clinical decision tree to guide practitioners in the surveillance of OPMDs. The proposed model provides clinicians with a practical tool to minimize the risk of malignant progression. Nevertheless, despite a growing body of literature, standardized surveillance protocols are still lacking, and further longitudinal research is required.
METHODS: This review consolidates evidence on the clinical features, malignant potential, treatment, and follow-up strategies for the four most common oral potentially malignant disorders.
RESULTS: This review highlights the variability in follow-up recommendations and emphasizes the need for individualized, evidence-informed monitoring strategies.
CONCLUSION: To the best of our knowledge, this is among the first structured attempts to present a comprehensive clinical decision tree to guide practitioners in the surveillance of OPMDs. The proposed model provides clinicians with a practical tool to minimize the risk of malignant progression. Nevertheless, despite a growing body of literature, standardized surveillance protocols are still lacking, and further longitudinal research is required.