MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.09.018

Медицинская библиотека · Resuscitation · 2016

Emergency department point-of-care ultrasound in out-of-hospital and in-ED cardiac arrest.

Gaspari Romolo, Weekes Anthony, Adhikari Srikar, Noble Vicki E, Nomura Jason T, Theodoro Daniel, Woo Michael, Atkinson Paul, Blehar David, Brown Samuel M, Caffery Terrell, Douglass Emily, Fraser Jacqueline, Haines Christine, Lam Samuel, Lanspa Michael, Lewis Margaret, Liebmann Otto, Limkakeng Alexander, Lopez Fernando, Platz Elke, Mendoza Michelle, Minnigan Hal, Moore Christopher, Novik Joseph, Rang Louise, Scruggs Will, Raio Christopher

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНаблюдательное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Point-of-care ultrasound has been suggested to improve outcomes from advanced cardiac life support (ACLS), but no large studies have explored how it should be incorporated into ACLS. Our aim was to determine whether cardiac activity on ultrasound during ACLS is associated with improved survival.

METHODS

We conducted a non-randomized, prospective, protocol-driven observational study at 20 hospitals across United States and Canada. Patients presenting with out-of-hospital arrest or in-ED arrest with pulseless electrical activity or asystole were included. An ultrasound was performed at the beginning and end of ACLS. The primary outcome was survival to hospital admission. Secondary outcomes included survival to hospital discharge and return of spontaneous circulation.

FINDINGS: 793 patients were enrolled, 208 (26.2%) survived the initial resuscitation, 114 (14.4%) survived to hospital admission, and 13 (1.6%) survived to hospital discharge. Cardiac activity on US was the variable most associated with survival at all time points. On multivariate regression modeling, cardiac activity was associated with increased survival to hospital admission (OR 3.6, 2.2-5.9) and hospital discharge (OR 5.7, 1.5-21.9). No cardiac activity on US was associated with non-survival, but 0.6% (95% CI 0.3-2.3) survived to discharge. Ultrasound identified findings that responded to non-ACLS interventions. Patients with pericardial effusion and pericardiocentesis demonstrated higher survival rates (15.4%) compared to all others (1.3%).

CONCLUSION

Cardiac activity on ultrasound was the variable most associated with survival following cardiac arrest. Ultrasound during cardiac arrest identifies interventions outside of the standard ACLS algorithm.

Для цитирования: Gaspari Romolo, Weekes Anthony, Adhikari Srikar, Noble Vicki E, Nomura Jason T, Theodoro Daniel, Woo Michael, Atkinson Paul, Blehar David, Brown Samuel M, Caffery Terrell, Douglass Emily, Fraser Jacqueline, Haines Christine, Lam Samuel, Lanspa Michael, Lewis Margaret, Liebmann Otto, Limkakeng Alexander, Lopez Fernando, Platz Elke, Mendoza Michelle, Minnigan Hal, Moore Christopher, Novik Joseph, Rang Louise, Scruggs Will, Raio Christopher. Emergency department point-of-care ultrasound in out-of-hospital and in-ED cardiac arrest.. Resuscitation. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.09.018.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.