MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.7759/cureus.73323

Медицинская библиотека · Cureus · 2024

Malignant Ventricular Arrhythmia With Apical Biventricular Noncompaction.

Seth Lakshya, Patel Vraj, Pandya Khyati

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Ventricular tachycardia (VT) arising from the right ventricle outflow tract is the most common cause of VT in children with a structurally normal heart. It often presents as a monomorphic VT that is usually amenable to ablation during an electrophysiology (EP) study. VT in children is typically idiopathic and benign but carries a risk for the degeneration of the arrhythmia into ventricular fibrillation or can result in sudden cardiac death. We present a unique case of a patient with a history of recurrent palpitations and chest tightness who was found to have a significant burden of malignant ventricular arrhythmias in the presence of apical biventricular noncompaction and preserved ventricular systolic function. The patient was referred for an EP study to assess for ablation if a discrete focus could be identified. During the EP study, the arrhythmia degenerated into ventricular fibrillation that required prompt defibrillation with a manual defibrillator and placement of a single-chamber transvenous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). This case report highlights how physicians should be mindful that although most cases of VT in children are idiopathic and benign, there is a risk of degeneration of the arrhythmia into ventricular fibrillation or resulting in sudden cardiac death. Prompt recognition of concerning VT with the involvement of EP in the patient's care is important.

Для цитирования: Seth Lakshya, Patel Vraj, Pandya Khyati. Malignant Ventricular Arrhythmia With Apical Biventricular Noncompaction.. Cureus. 2024. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.73323.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.