Pediatric surgery international · 2018
Safety and usefulness of plastic closure in infants with gastroschisis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
СтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Miyake Hiromu, Seo Shogo, O'Connell Joshua S, Janssen Lok Maarten, Pierro Agostino
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Recently, plastic closure of abdominal defect in infants with gastroschisis has been used. Timing of gastroschisis closure can be mainly divided into two groups: primary closure and delayed closure after silo forming. Safety and usefulness of plastic closure in gastroschisis remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the current evidence for plastic closure in infants with gastroschisis.
METHODS: The analysis was done for primary closure as well as closure after silo. Outcomes were mortality, wound infection, duration of ventilation, time to feeding, and length of hospital stay (LOS). The quality of evidence was summarized using the GRADE approach.
RESULTS: In the "primary" group, there was no significant difference in mortality, time to feeding initiation and LOS. In the "silo" group, wound infection was significantly lower in plastic closure (Odds ratio 0.24, 95%CI 0.09-0.69, p = 0.008). Duration of ventilation, time to feeding initiation and LOS were significantly shorter after plastic closure (Ventilation; mean difference (MD) - 5.76, p = 0.03. Feeding initiation; MD - 9.42, p < 0.0001. LOS; MD - 14.06, p = 0.002). Quality of evidence was very low for all outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Current results suggest that plastic closure may be beneficial for infants with gastroschisis requiring silo formation. However, this evidence is suboptimal and further studies are needed.
METHODS: The analysis was done for primary closure as well as closure after silo. Outcomes were mortality, wound infection, duration of ventilation, time to feeding, and length of hospital stay (LOS). The quality of evidence was summarized using the GRADE approach.
RESULTS: In the "primary" group, there was no significant difference in mortality, time to feeding initiation and LOS. In the "silo" group, wound infection was significantly lower in plastic closure (Odds ratio 0.24, 95%CI 0.09-0.69, p = 0.008). Duration of ventilation, time to feeding initiation and LOS were significantly shorter after plastic closure (Ventilation; mean difference (MD) - 5.76, p = 0.03. Feeding initiation; MD - 9.42, p < 0.0001. LOS; MD - 14.06, p = 0.002). Quality of evidence was very low for all outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Current results suggest that plastic closure may be beneficial for infants with gastroschisis requiring silo formation. However, this evidence is suboptimal and further studies are needed.