Gan to kagaku ryoho. Cancer & chemotherapy · 2013
[A case of lung cancer resistant to pemetrexed responding to S-1 monotherapy].
Клинический случайАннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Oyamada Yoshitaka, Maeshima Arafumi, Takeuchi Ken, Kato Ryoichi
Аннотация
Pemetrexed(PEM)and S-1 are both cytotoxic anti-tumor drugs that target thymidylate synthase(TS). Here, we report a case of lung cancer resistant to PEM, but responsive to S-1 monotherapy. A 50-year-old male with lung cancer(adenocarcinoma, EGFR mutation negative)at Stage III B(T4N2M0)received PEM as third-line chemotherapy. However, metastatic mediastinal lymph nodes were increased in size. A switch to gemcitabine(GEM)resulted in further enlargement of the nodes and elevation of the serum CEA level. Introduction of S-1 monotherapy(120mg/body/day divided into two doses, 4-week administration every 6 weeks, 6 courses)reduced the size of the nodes and serum CEA was normalized. Although S-1 as well as PEM, target TS, the mechanisms in these two drugs that lead to resistance are not the same. Furthermore, S-1 induces dysfunction of RNA through the generation of fluoro-uridine monophosphate(FUMP). We conclude that S-1 can be a drug of choice, even in cases that show resistance to PEM.