Acta neurochirurgica · 2019
Bypass strategies for common carotid artery occlusion.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hecht Nils, Wessels Lars, Fekonja Lucius, von Weitzel-Mudersbach Paul, Vajkoczy Peter
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Common carotid artery occlusion (CCA-occlusion) is a rare condition where standard revascularization is not feasible. Here, we analyzed our experience with surgical revascularization of CCA-occlusion to develop an algorithm for selection of the most suitable bypass strategy according to the Riles classification.
METHODS: During a 10-year period, 16 out of 288 patients with cerebrovascular disease and compromised hemodynamic reserve underwent revascularization for unilateral CCA-occlusion. The utilized bypass strategies included (1) a saphenous vein graft from the subclavian artery (SA) to the internal carotid artery (ICA), (2) a radial artery graft from the V3 segment of the vertebral artery (VA) to a superficial branch of the middle cerebral artery (MCA), or (3) a saphenous vein graft from the SA to a deep branch of the MCA.
RESULTS: In CCA-occlusion with maintained external carotid artery (ECA)/ICA patency (Riles type 1A), an SA-ICA bypass was performed (25%). In cases without ECA/ICA patency (Riles type 1B or 2) but suitable VA, a VA-MCA bypass was grafted (31%). In cases with unsuitable VA, a long SA-MCA interposition bypass was performed (38%). Transient postoperative neurological deficits occurred in 5 patients (31%) with 1 patient (6%) suffering permanent neurological worsening and 1 mortality (6%). Overall, no difference was found between the median preoperative mRS (2; range, 1-4) and the mRS at the time point of the last follow-up (2; range, 1-6; p = 0.75). The long-term graft patency was 94%.
CONCLUSIONS: Although surgical revascularization for CCA-occlusion is feasible, it is associated with a higher risk than standard bypass grafting. Considering the poor natural history of CCA-occlusion, however, this risk may be justified in carefully selected patients.
METHODS: During a 10-year period, 16 out of 288 patients with cerebrovascular disease and compromised hemodynamic reserve underwent revascularization for unilateral CCA-occlusion. The utilized bypass strategies included (1) a saphenous vein graft from the subclavian artery (SA) to the internal carotid artery (ICA), (2) a radial artery graft from the V3 segment of the vertebral artery (VA) to a superficial branch of the middle cerebral artery (MCA), or (3) a saphenous vein graft from the SA to a deep branch of the MCA.
RESULTS: In CCA-occlusion with maintained external carotid artery (ECA)/ICA patency (Riles type 1A), an SA-ICA bypass was performed (25%). In cases without ECA/ICA patency (Riles type 1B or 2) but suitable VA, a VA-MCA bypass was grafted (31%). In cases with unsuitable VA, a long SA-MCA interposition bypass was performed (38%). Transient postoperative neurological deficits occurred in 5 patients (31%) with 1 patient (6%) suffering permanent neurological worsening and 1 mortality (6%). Overall, no difference was found between the median preoperative mRS (2; range, 1-4) and the mRS at the time point of the last follow-up (2; range, 1-6; p = 0.75). The long-term graft patency was 94%.
CONCLUSIONS: Although surgical revascularization for CCA-occlusion is feasible, it is associated with a higher risk than standard bypass grafting. Considering the poor natural history of CCA-occlusion, however, this risk may be justified in carefully selected patients.