Single bolus 30% hypertonic saline for refractory intracranial hypertension.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
In recent years hypertonic saline has attracted increasing interest in the treatment of traumatic intracranial hypertension, and has a number of documented and theoretical advantages over other hyperosmolar agents. To date, no consensus has been achieved on the safest and most effective HTS concentration for administration.
AIMS: The purpose of this paper was to evaluate the efficacy of intravenous bolus administration of highly concentrated (30 %) hypertonic saline (HTS) in the treatment of refractory intracranial hypertension secondary to traumatic brain injury.
METHODS
Patients were treated with an intravenous bolus of 10 ml of 30 % hypertonic saline. Multiple physiological parameters were measured throughout, including intracranial pressure, mean arterial pressure, cerebral perfusion pressure, pulse and inotrope/pressor requirements. Laboratory investigation pre and post HTS administration included: arterial pH, pCO2, HCO3, base excess; serum biochemistry measurements of sodium, potassium, chloride, urea and creatinine; and coagulation studies.
RESULTS
TBI patients saw a rapid and significant reduction in ICP from a baseline value of 28 ± 5.31 to 18.44 ± 6.17 mmHg at 1 h post HTS, a statistically significant reduction that was maintained for up to 7 h. This response was maintained even with repeated HTS administration, which was also associated with an augmented cerebral perfusion pressure from a baseline of 58.0 ± 6.48 to 76.33 mmHg within 1 h of HTS administration.
CONCLUSION
No associated harmful biochemical or haematological abnormalities were noted. In conclusion, highly concentrated 30 % HTS appears to be both effective and safe in the management of refractory intracranial hypertension.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.