DOI 10.1080/00015458.2004.11679646
Intravaginal slingplasty: short term results.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Numerous surgical techniques have been described for the treatment of vaginal vault prolapses. In 1997, a new minimally invasive procedure was introduced by Petros: the infracoccygeal sacropexy, also known as Intravaginal Slingplasty (IVS). This technique is used to place a mesh in the recto-vaginal fascia and to reinforce the uterosacral ligament by placing a polypropylene tape between the perineum and the vaginal vault. Since July 2002, we have changed our approach to the treatment of vaginal vault prolapses and now perform IVS. The aim of this study was to report our early experience and short-term results with IVS.
METHODS
Prospective single-institution non-randomized trial of patients who underwent IVS. Indications, intra- and post-operative complications were recorded as well as early post-operative results.
RESULTS
34 patients with a mean age of 60+/-13 years, were operated during a 12-month period. Surgical indications included rectoceles (n = 27), enteroceles (n = 26), cystoceles (n = 15) and hysteroceles (n = 9). 85% of the patients (n = 29) had more than one prolapse. Mean operative time was 63+/-19 minutes, with a 0% intra-operative complication rate. Post-operative complication rate was 2.9%: bleeding from an internal haemorrhoid required surgical haemostasis. Median post-operative stay was 3 days (range: 2-7 days). There was also one post operative complication (2.9%, a mesh erosion). Recurrence rate was 8.8% (two cystoceles and one rectocele recurred after surgery).
CONCLUSION
Posterior IVS provides a safe and efficacious treatment for posterior vaginal vault prolapses. Long-term results are required to assess the functional results and recurrence rate of the technique.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.