MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ccrj.2024.02.002

Медицинская библиотека · Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2024

Statistical analysis plan for the SQUEEZE trial: A trial to determine whether septic shock reversal is quicker in pediatric patients randomized to an early goal-directed fluid-sparing strategy vs. usual care (SQUEEZE).

Parker Melissa J, Foster Gary, Fox-Robichaud Alison, Choong Karen, Mbuagbaw Lawrence, Thabane Lehana, With the SQUEEZE Trial Steering Committee and on behalf of the SQUEEZE Trial Investigators, the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group, Pediatric Emergency Research Canada, and the Canadian Critical Care Translational Biology Group

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The SQUEEZE trial is a multicentred randomized controlled trial which seeks to determine the optimal approach to fluid resuscitation in paediatric septic shock. SQUEEZE also includes a nested translational study, SQUEEZE-D, investigating the value of plasma cell-free DNA for prediction of clinical outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To present a pre-specified statistical analysis plan (SAP) for the SQUEEZE trial prior to finalizing the trial data set and prior to commencing data analysis.

DESIGN

SQUEEZE is a pragmatic, two-arm, open-label, prospective multicentre randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Canadian paediatric tertiary care centres.

PARTICIPANTS

Paediatric patients with suspected sepsis and persistent signs of shock in need of ongoing resuscitation. Sample size target: 400 participants.

INTERVENTIONS: The trial is designed to compare a fluid-sparing resuscitation strategy to usual care.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome for the SQUEEZE trial is the time to shock reversal (in hours). The primary outcome analysis will assess the difference in time to shock reversal between the intervention and control groups, reported as point estimate with 95% confidence intervals. The statistical test for the primary analysis will be a two-sided t-test. Secondary outcome measures include clinical outcomes and adverse events including measures of organ dysfunction and mortality outcomes.

RESULTS

The SAP presented here is reflective of and where necessary clarifies in detail the analysis plan as presented in the trial protocol. The SAP includes a mock CONSORT diagram, figures and tables. Data collection methods are summarized, primary and secondary outcomes are defined, and outcome analyses are described.

CONCLUSIONS

We have developed a statistical analysis plan for the SQUEEZE Trial for transparency and to align with best practices. Analysis of SQUEEZE Trial data will adhere to the SAP to reduce the risk of bias.

REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: Definitive trial NCT03080038; Registered Feb 28, 2017. Pilot Trial NCT01973907; Registered Oct 27, 2013.

Для цитирования: Parker Melissa J, Foster Gary, Fox-Robichaud Alison, Choong Karen, Mbuagbaw Lawrence, Thabane Lehana, With the SQUEEZE Trial Steering Committee and on behalf of the SQUEEZE Trial Investigators, the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group, Pediatric Emergency Research Canada, and the Canadian Critical Care Translational Biology Group. Statistical analysis plan for the SQUEEZE trial: A trial to determine whether septic shock reversal is quicker in pediatric patients randomized to an early goal-directed fluid-sparing strategy vs. usual care (SQUEEZE).. Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccrj.2024.02.002.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.