Threshold association analysis between residual tumour size and distant metastasis risk after neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer: A multicentre retrospective study.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: This study aimed to perform a threshold analysis of residual tumour size (RTS) to identify the critical threshold influencing distant metastasis (DM), thereby enabling more precise risk stratification.
METHODS
This multicentre retrospective cohort study included patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who underwent radical surgery following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). Kaplan-Meier survival curves were plotted and compared using the log-rank test. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify independent prognostic factors. The threshold-effect analysis was performed to determine the potential critical point of RTS.
RESULTS
In this multi-institutional study, threshold-effect analysis identified a significant inflection point at 3 cm for the association between RTS and DM risk. Below this threshold, each 1-cm increase was associated with a markedly higher risk (HR = 1.70, p = 0.015), whereas no significant association was observed above 3 cm (p = 0.692). Patients with an RTS ≥3 cm exhibited significantly poorer early (≤ 24 months) recurrence-free survival (RFS) and disease-free survival (DFS). After 24 months, the pattern was reversed. RTS ≥3 cm was an independent risk factor for both worse RFS (HR = 1.45, p = 0.033) and DM. Subgroup analyses confirmed the consistent negative prognostic impact of RTS ≥3 cm across most strata.
CONCLUSIONS
This study established an objective prognostic threshold for RTS following nCRT. This marks a shift in the understanding of this indicator-from a static association between 'risk and size' to a dynamic association between 'risk and time'.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.