MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1128/jcm.29.10.2220-2223.1991

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of clinical microbiology · 1991

Evaluation of the L-CLONE Legionella pneumophila Serogroup 1 Urine Antigen Latex Test.

Leland D S, Kohler R B

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the L-CLONE Legionella pneumophila Serogroup 1 Urine Antigen Latex Test (Access Medical Systems, Inc., Branford, Conn.) for detection of Legionella antigen in urine. A total of 481 frozen urine samples previously tested by an in-house solid-phase radioimmunoassay (RIA) was thawed and retested by using L-CLONE. Included in this sample were 140 RIA-positive samples from culture-positive or serologically confirmed cases of legionellosis and 341 RIA-negative samples from patients with non-Legionella respiratory disease or bacteriuria. The original RIA test result was accepted as the true value. L-CLONE correctly identified 76 of 140 (54%) known positive samples. False-negative results could not be attributed to a low Legionella antigen concentration or to a Legionella antigen subgroup. L-CLONE correctly identified 252 of 341 (74%) known negative samples. False-positive results were experienced in all groups of negative samples, regardless of the patients' underlying diseases. A total of 141 fresh urine samples was tested; all were Legionella antigen negative by RIA. L-CLONE provided 86% specificity. The sensitivity of the L-CLONE in testing fresh urine samples could not be evaluated because of the lack of Legionella antigen RIA-positive samples.

Для цитирования: Leland D S, Kohler R B. Evaluation of the L-CLONE Legionella pneumophila Serogroup 1 Urine Antigen Latex Test.. Journal of clinical microbiology. 1991. DOI: 10.1128/jcm.29.10.2220-2223.1991.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.