The Journal of craniofacial surgery · 2005
Long-term outcomes of ultra-thin porous polyethylene implants used for reconstruction of orbital floor defects.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ozturk Serdar, Sengezer Mustafa, Isik S, Turegun M, Deveci Mustafa, Cil Y
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The objective of this article is to present the long-term outcomes of ultra-thin polyethylene implants used for orbital floor reconstruction in facial trauma patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 1998 to 2004, 38 patients underwent orbital floor reconstruction with porous polyethylene implants with a mean follow-up of 4 years. A subciliary incision and preexisting facial wounds or scars were used. The boundaries of the maxillofacial injury and the orbital volumes of both orbits were assessed by computed tomography images obtained pre- and postoperatively. In all patients, ultra-thin porous polyethylene implants in various sizes were used to reconstruct the orbital floor defect.
RESULTS: None of the patients needed removal of the implants during the follow-up. The volume increase of the traumatized orbits ranged from 0.04 to 6.18 (average 3.12 +/- 1.48) mL compared with the intact orbit (P < 0.01). This difference was not significant postoperatively (P > 0.01). Postoperative ectropion in three cases was corrected under local anesthesia. Persistence of complications were as follows: enophthalmos, 3 in 28; diplopia, 1 in 16; dystopia, 1 in 4; and infraorbital nerve hypoesthesia, 3 in 31. One patient underwent late enucleation of the globe because of initial penetrating trauma.
CONCLUSIONS: We recommend the use of ultra-thin porous polyethylene implants in the reconstruction of the orbital floor defects in facial trauma patients. The implants are durable in the long-term and mimic the anatomy of the thin orbital floor and avoid the morbidity of autogenous bone grafts.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 1998 to 2004, 38 patients underwent orbital floor reconstruction with porous polyethylene implants with a mean follow-up of 4 years. A subciliary incision and preexisting facial wounds or scars were used. The boundaries of the maxillofacial injury and the orbital volumes of both orbits were assessed by computed tomography images obtained pre- and postoperatively. In all patients, ultra-thin porous polyethylene implants in various sizes were used to reconstruct the orbital floor defect.
RESULTS: None of the patients needed removal of the implants during the follow-up. The volume increase of the traumatized orbits ranged from 0.04 to 6.18 (average 3.12 +/- 1.48) mL compared with the intact orbit (P < 0.01). This difference was not significant postoperatively (P > 0.01). Postoperative ectropion in three cases was corrected under local anesthesia. Persistence of complications were as follows: enophthalmos, 3 in 28; diplopia, 1 in 16; dystopia, 1 in 4; and infraorbital nerve hypoesthesia, 3 in 31. One patient underwent late enucleation of the globe because of initial penetrating trauma.
CONCLUSIONS: We recommend the use of ultra-thin porous polyethylene implants in the reconstruction of the orbital floor defects in facial trauma patients. The implants are durable in the long-term and mimic the anatomy of the thin orbital floor and avoid the morbidity of autogenous bone grafts.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdultBiocompatible MaterialsDiplopiaEctropionEnophthalmosFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansHypesthesiaLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedOrbitOrbital FracturesPolyethylenePolyethylenesPorosityPostoperative ComplicationsProstheses and ImplantsPlastic Surgery ProceduresSurface PropertiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedTreatment Outcome