European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2017
Discovery Elbow System: clinical and radiological results after 2- to 10-year follow-up.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hänninen Patrik, Niinimäki Tuukka, Flinkkilä Tapio, Niinimäki Jaakko, Ohtonen Pasi, Yli-Luukko Susanna, Leppilahti Juhana
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Discovery Elbow System (DES) is a semi-constrained prosthesis, mainly used for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
METHODS: Records from 79 patients with RA (90 DES arthroplasties) were reviewed; 47 patients with 55 DES elbows were re-examined. Range of motion (ROM) of both elbows, upper limb function, and quality of life (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand [DASH] score, Mayo Elbow Performance Score [MEPS], and the RAND 36-Item Health Survey [RAND-36]) were assessed. Cementing quality was assessed, and radiolucent lines measured from plain radiographs. Mean follow-up was 64 (range 24-123) months.
RESULTS: Pre-operatively to post-operatively, mean elbow flexion improved from 120° to 146° (p < 0.001) and mean extension lag improved from 29° to 24° (p = 0.02), respectively. At follow-up, mean supination was 66°, mean pronation was 69°, and mean grip strength was 14 kg. Grip strength and ROM (except supination) were similar between the DES elbow and contralateral un-operated elbow. Mean post-operative MEPS was 93 points (excellent, n = 38; good, n = 14; fair, n = 2; and poor, n = 1). Mean DASH score was 43 points. The RAND-36 showed that physical functioning, physical role functioning, bodily pain, and general health were lower than the Finnish reference values. Primary cementing was challenging, and radiolucent lines appeared during follow-up. Four prostheses were revised because of aseptic loosening (n = 3) and periprosthetic fracture (n = 1).
CONCLUSION: DES provides significant improvement in patient's flexion-extension arc. Cementing of the elbow prosthesis was challenging; radiolucent lines appeared during the 5-year follow-up, but their clinical relevance remains unclear. First-generation locking screws may loosen over time.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.
METHODS: Records from 79 patients with RA (90 DES arthroplasties) were reviewed; 47 patients with 55 DES elbows were re-examined. Range of motion (ROM) of both elbows, upper limb function, and quality of life (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand [DASH] score, Mayo Elbow Performance Score [MEPS], and the RAND 36-Item Health Survey [RAND-36]) were assessed. Cementing quality was assessed, and radiolucent lines measured from plain radiographs. Mean follow-up was 64 (range 24-123) months.
RESULTS: Pre-operatively to post-operatively, mean elbow flexion improved from 120° to 146° (p < 0.001) and mean extension lag improved from 29° to 24° (p = 0.02), respectively. At follow-up, mean supination was 66°, mean pronation was 69°, and mean grip strength was 14 kg. Grip strength and ROM (except supination) were similar between the DES elbow and contralateral un-operated elbow. Mean post-operative MEPS was 93 points (excellent, n = 38; good, n = 14; fair, n = 2; and poor, n = 1). Mean DASH score was 43 points. The RAND-36 showed that physical functioning, physical role functioning, bodily pain, and general health were lower than the Finnish reference values. Primary cementing was challenging, and radiolucent lines appeared during follow-up. Four prostheses were revised because of aseptic loosening (n = 3) and periprosthetic fracture (n = 1).
CONCLUSION: DES provides significant improvement in patient's flexion-extension arc. Cementing of the elbow prosthesis was challenging; radiolucent lines appeared during the 5-year follow-up, but their clinical relevance remains unclear. First-generation locking screws may loosen over time.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.