Nuclear medicine communications · 2015
Effects of myocardial perfusion abnormalities on the accuracy of left ventricular volume and ejection fraction measured by thallium-201 gated single-photon emission tomography: comparison with echocardiography as the reference standard.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kurisu Satoshi, Iwasaki Toshitaka, Abe Nobukazu, Tamura Megumi, Ikenaga Hiroki, Watanabe Noriaki, Higaki Tadanao, Shimonaga Takashi, Ishibashi Ken, Dohi Yoshihiro, Fukuda Yukihiro, Kihara Yasuki
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: We assessed the accuracy of left ventricular end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), and ejection fraction (EF) using quantitative gated single-photon emission computed tomography (QGS) in comparison with echocardiography as the reference standard. We also assessed the effects of total perfusion deficit (TPD) on the accuracy of QGS measurements.
METHODS: A total of 258 patients underwent single-photon emission computed tomography and transthoracic echocardiography within 4 weeks of each investigation for evaluating coronary artery disease. Patients were divided into four groups according to TPD scores.
RESULTS: There were 138 patients with no/minimal TPD, 64 patients with small TPD, 35 patients with middle TPD, and 21 patients with large TPD. There were good correlations and agreements in EDV (r=0.87, 0.90, 0.71, and 0.94, respectively), ESV (r=0.92, 0.94, 0.79, and 0.94, respectively), and EF (r=0.61, 0.79, 0.61, and 0.83, respectively) between QGS and echocardiography in patients with any TPD. QGS significantly underestimated EDV and ESV in patients with no/minimal or small TPD, and significantly overestimated ESV in patients with large TPD. QGS significantly underestimated EF in patients with middle or large TPD.
CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that QGS is a useful tool for assessing the left ventricular volume and function in patients with any TPD, but myocardial perfusion abnormalities should be taken into consideration when interpreting QRS measurements.
METHODS: A total of 258 patients underwent single-photon emission computed tomography and transthoracic echocardiography within 4 weeks of each investigation for evaluating coronary artery disease. Patients were divided into four groups according to TPD scores.
RESULTS: There were 138 patients with no/minimal TPD, 64 patients with small TPD, 35 patients with middle TPD, and 21 patients with large TPD. There were good correlations and agreements in EDV (r=0.87, 0.90, 0.71, and 0.94, respectively), ESV (r=0.92, 0.94, 0.79, and 0.94, respectively), and EF (r=0.61, 0.79, 0.61, and 0.83, respectively) between QGS and echocardiography in patients with any TPD. QGS significantly underestimated EDV and ESV in patients with no/minimal or small TPD, and significantly overestimated ESV in patients with large TPD. QGS significantly underestimated EF in patients with middle or large TPD.
CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that QGS is a useful tool for assessing the left ventricular volume and function in patients with any TPD, but myocardial perfusion abnormalities should be taken into consideration when interpreting QRS measurements.