MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1056/nejmoa2501443

Медицинская библиотека · The New England journal of medicine · 2025

First-Line Treatment of Pulmonary Sarcoidosis with Prednisone or Methotrexate.

Kahlmann Vivienne, Janssen Bonás Montse, Moor Catharina C, Grutters Jan C, Mostard Rémy L M, van Rijswijk Henricus N A J, van der Maten Jan, Marges Emiel R, Moonen Linda A A, Overbeek Maria J, Koopman Bart, Loth Daan W, Nossent Esther J, Wagenaar Michiel, Kramer Henk, Wielders Pascal L M L, Bonta Peter I, Walen Stefan, Bogaarts Brigitte A H A, Kerstens René, Overgaauw Mayka, Veltkamp Marcel, Wijsenbeek Marlies S, PREDMETH Collaborators

Клиническое исследование IV фазыEquivalence TrialСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Prednisone is currently recommended as the first-line treatment for pulmonary sarcoidosis but is associated with many side effects. Methotrexate, which is recommended as a second-line treatment, appears to have fewer side effects than prednisone but a slower onset of action. Data are needed on the efficacy and side-effect profile of methotrexate as compared with prednisone as first-line treatment for pulmonary sarcoidosis.

METHODS

In this multicenter, open-label, noninferiority trial involving patients with pulmonary sarcoidosis who had not previously received treatment, we randomly assigned patients, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive prednisone or methotrexate according to a prespecified treatment schedule. The primary end point was the mean change from baseline to week 24 in the percentage of the predicted forced vital capacity (FVC), as estimated with the use of mixed models for repeated measures. The noninferiority margin for the primary end point was 5 percentage points.

RESULTS

Of the 138 patients who underwent randomization, 70 were assigned to receive prednisone and 68 to receive methotrexate. The unadjusted mean change from baseline to week 24 in the percentage of the predicted FVC was 6.75 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.50 to 8.99) in the prednisone group and 6.11 percentage points (95% CI, 3.72 to 8.50) in the methotrexate group. Methotrexate was noninferior to prednisone with regard to the primary end point, with an adjusted between-group difference of -1.17 percentage points (95% CI, -4.27 to 1.93). Adverse events occurred in a similar percentage of patients in the two trial groups. Weight gain, insomnia, and increased appetite were the most common adverse events with prednisone, and nausea, fatigue, and any abnormal liver-function test were among the most common adverse events with methotrexate.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with pulmonary sarcoidosis, initial treatment with methotrexate was noninferior to that with prednisone with regard to the change from baseline to week 24 in the percentage of the predicted FVC. Differences in the side-effect profile between methotrexate and prednisone may inform shared decision making by providers and patients about the appropriate treatment approach. (Funded by the Dutch Lung Foundation; PREDMETH ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04314193.).

Для цитирования: Kahlmann Vivienne, Janssen Bonás Montse, Moor Catharina C, Grutters Jan C, Mostard Rémy L M, van Rijswijk Henricus N A J, van der Maten Jan, Marges Emiel R, Moonen Linda A A, Overbeek Maria J, Koopman Bart, Loth Daan W, Nossent Esther J, Wagenaar Michiel, Kramer Henk, Wielders Pascal L M L, Bonta Peter I, Walen Stefan, Bogaarts Brigitte A H A, Kerstens René, Overgaauw Mayka, Veltkamp Marcel, Wijsenbeek Marlies S, PREDMETH Collaborators. First-Line Treatment of Pulmonary Sarcoidosis with Prednisone or Methotrexate.. The New England journal of medicine. 2025. DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa2501443.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.