Surgical infections · 2013
Does primary closure increase surgical site infection after intestinal stoma reversal? A retrospective cohort study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Murtaza Ghulam, Nuruddin Rozina, Memon Ayaz Ahmad, Chawla Tabish, Azam Iqbal, Mukhtar Yasir
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: This study was undertaken to test the veracity of the hypothesis that primary incision closure after intestinal stoma reversal in adult patients is associated with a greater risk of surgical site infection (SSI) than are open incisions.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at the Surgical Department of the Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan. The study included adult patients who underwent elective loop and double-barreled intestinal stoma (ileostomy or colostomy) reversal through peristomal incisions between January 2005 and May 2011. Files were reviewed independently by two surgeons to establish main exposure (closed or open surgical sites) and outcome; i.e., SSI based on U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria.
RESULTS: Sample size calculation prior to the study required 71 patients to be included in each exposure arm. Patients with closed surgical sites were relatively younger (mean 36±15 [standard deviation] years) than those with open surgical sites (41±15 years), with a male preponderance in both groups. Fifteen patients were found to have SSI: 3/71 (4.2%) in open and 12/71 (16.9%) in closed incisions. The risk of SSI in closed surgical sites was 5.8 times greater than in open sites (95% confidence interval for relative risk 1.5-22.5) after adjusting for gender, body mass index (BMI), site of stoma, malignant disease, and preoperative chemo-radiotherapy.
CONCLUSION: The risk of SSI in closed incisions is greater than that in open incisions. It is suggested that incisions not be closed primarily in patients undergoing stoma reversal.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at the Surgical Department of the Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan. The study included adult patients who underwent elective loop and double-barreled intestinal stoma (ileostomy or colostomy) reversal through peristomal incisions between January 2005 and May 2011. Files were reviewed independently by two surgeons to establish main exposure (closed or open surgical sites) and outcome; i.e., SSI based on U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria.
RESULTS: Sample size calculation prior to the study required 71 patients to be included in each exposure arm. Patients with closed surgical sites were relatively younger (mean 36±15 [standard deviation] years) than those with open surgical sites (41±15 years), with a male preponderance in both groups. Fifteen patients were found to have SSI: 3/71 (4.2%) in open and 12/71 (16.9%) in closed incisions. The risk of SSI in closed surgical sites was 5.8 times greater than in open sites (95% confidence interval for relative risk 1.5-22.5) after adjusting for gender, body mass index (BMI), site of stoma, malignant disease, and preoperative chemo-radiotherapy.
CONCLUSION: The risk of SSI in closed incisions is greater than that in open incisions. It is suggested that incisions not be closed primarily in patients undergoing stoma reversal.