MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Annali italiani di chirurgia · 2021

Combining traditional and microsurgical reconstruction after a complex hand trauma with multiple tissue defects. A case report.

Messana Francesco, Faccio Diego, Rizzato Sandro, Marchica Paolo, Bassetto Franco, Vindigni Vincenzo, Tiengo Cesare

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Complex injuries involving bones, tendons and soft tissues of the hand still represent a difficult challenge for reconstructive surgeons. Hereby, we present a case of a man suffering from a complex crush injury of the right hand that led to a wide three-dimensional defect with loss of two metacarpal bones, extensor tendons and skin. For composite hand defects, the most common surgical approach provides for a one-stage composite reconstruction or for an early restoration of bone and skin, with delayed tendon grafts. For the peculiarity of the defect, a one-stage reconstruction was not feasible. Hence, we opted for a two-stage reconstruction but the usual surgical steps have been inverted. First we secured tendon and skin restoration through a composite teno-cutaneous radial free flap. A month later, we reconstructed the two metacarpals with a modified Masquelet technique using fibular cortical graft. This strategy allowed the patient to start an early rehabilitation program and obtain a satisfactory recovery of his dominant hand. KEY WORDS: Composite flap, Hand trauma, Hand reconstruction, Microsurgery.

Для цитирования: Messana Francesco, Faccio Diego, Rizzato Sandro, Marchica Paolo, Bassetto Franco, Vindigni Vincenzo, Tiengo Cesare. Combining traditional and microsurgical reconstruction after a complex hand trauma with multiple tissue defects. A case report.. Annali italiani di chirurgia. 2021.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.