Clinical breast cancer · 2026
The Impact of Expanded Access to Germline High Penetrance Genetic Testing for Women With a New Diagnosis of Invasive Breast Cancer or High-Grade DCIS.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hudson-Phillips Sarah P, Nanda Akriti, Attia Mohamed, Al Yaqout Wadha, Marshall Evelyn, Rusby Jennifer E, Krupa Katherine, Barry Peter A, Tasoulis Marios Konstantinos, Gui Gerald, Merh Radhika, Torr Bethany, Kemp Zoe, George Angela, Turnbull Clare, O'Connell Rachel L
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Approximately 3% of patients with breast cancer have an inherited pathogenic variant in high-penetrance genes such as BRCA1, BRCA2 or PALB2. Knowledge of genetic testing result may impact surgery undertaken at the time of index breast cancer treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of a positive high penetrance genetic test (HPGT) on surgical decision-making.
METHODS: Females >18 years diagnosed with invasive breast cancer or high-grade Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) without prior BRCA-gene testing were included. In patients with a germline pathogenic variant (GPV) further data on surgical decision-making were collected.
RESULTS: Five hundred seventy-six patients were included. Median time from consent to result was 33 days (inter-quartile range 25-45). GPV rate was 3.6% (21/576): 11 BRCA1 (1.9%), 6 BRCA2 (1%), 4 PALB2 (0.7%). Five (23.8%) of 21 patients with GPV would not have been eligible for HPGT on the UK National Health Service R208 pathway. Four hundred eighty (83.3%) of the 576 patients underwent primary breast cancer surgery; 121 (25.2%) of 480 patients received results pre-operatively, 359 (74.8%) post-operatively. Pre-operative GPV knowledge significantly influenced the initial surgical procedure undertaken (P = .002). Uptake of subsequent risk-reducing surgery was higher with a preoperative result (100% vs. 71.4%), although this difference was not statistically significant (P = .24).
CONCLUSIONS: Early timing of positive HPGT results significantly influences surgical decision-making and increases pre-operative uptake of bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy. Expanded HPGT access in this study identified 24% additional patients with GPV who would not have met current UK testing criteria.
METHODS: Females >18 years diagnosed with invasive breast cancer or high-grade Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) without prior BRCA-gene testing were included. In patients with a germline pathogenic variant (GPV) further data on surgical decision-making were collected.
RESULTS: Five hundred seventy-six patients were included. Median time from consent to result was 33 days (inter-quartile range 25-45). GPV rate was 3.6% (21/576): 11 BRCA1 (1.9%), 6 BRCA2 (1%), 4 PALB2 (0.7%). Five (23.8%) of 21 patients with GPV would not have been eligible for HPGT on the UK National Health Service R208 pathway. Four hundred eighty (83.3%) of the 576 patients underwent primary breast cancer surgery; 121 (25.2%) of 480 patients received results pre-operatively, 359 (74.8%) post-operatively. Pre-operative GPV knowledge significantly influenced the initial surgical procedure undertaken (P = .002). Uptake of subsequent risk-reducing surgery was higher with a preoperative result (100% vs. 71.4%), although this difference was not statistically significant (P = .24).
CONCLUSIONS: Early timing of positive HPGT results significantly influences surgical decision-making and increases pre-operative uptake of bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy. Expanded HPGT access in this study identified 24% additional patients with GPV who would not have met current UK testing criteria.