Comparing Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in Infants With Patent Ductus Arteriosus Stenting Versus Blalock-Taussig-Thomas Shunt: A Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND

Patent ductus arteriosus stenting (PDAS) is a nonsurgical alternative to Blalock-Taussig-Thomas shunt (BTTS) for infants with ductal-dependent congenital heart disease. In this single-center study, we aimed to compare neurodevelopmental outcomes in children who underwent BTTS as initial palliation versus PDAS.

METHODS

Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development Screening Test (Bayley-III) reports and mode of feeding data were collected for any patient who underwent PDAS or BTTS at Rady Children's Hospital from 2013 to 2021. We also prospectively administered the Parents' Evaluation of Development Status questionnaire (PEDS) to parents of children aged 2-8 years in this patient population.

RESULTS

Of the 99 patients, 64 received a Bayley-III assessment and/or PEDS screen. Of the 35 who had a Bayley-III, there was a higher proportion of patients with PDAS who scored as developmentally appropriate compared with BTTS. PEDS screen showed that a higher proportion of patients with PDAS had no parental concern for delay than that of patients with BTTS (63% vs 30%). Patients with BTTS were more likely to undergo gastrostomy tube placement than patients with PDAS.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that neurodevelopmental measures are feasible, clinically relevant, and should be included in comparative effectiveness studies of infant congenital interventions. Whether PDAS offers neurodevelopmental benefit over BTTS should be confirmed in a prospective powered randomized controlled clinical trial.