MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2176/nmc.48.526

Медицинская библиотека · Neurologia medico-chirurgica · 2008

Transanal prolapse of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt catheter--case report.

Matsuoka Hidenori, Takegami Tetsuro, Maruyama Daisuke, Hamasaki Tomoyuki, Kakita Kiyohito, Mineura Katsuyoshi

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

A 4-year-old girl presented with asymptomatic bowel perforation and transanal protrusion of a ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt catheter. She had undergone repair of myelomeningocele at birth and subsequent VP shunting for congenital hydrocephalus 1 month later. Seven months after VP shunting, she underwent revision of the peritoneal catheter. She complained of abdominal pain and nausea at the age of 4 years. She was treated conservatively for 1 month for intestinal obstruction. One month later, her mother noticed the shunt catheter protruding from her anus. Computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen revealed that the peritoneal catheter had migrated into the colon, and CT of the head showed symmetrical dilation of the ventricles. The shunt system was removed immediately, repair of the fistula in the sigmoid colon was performed, and external ventricular drainage was continued for 6 weeks until shunt replacement. One month after the first operation, intestinal obstruction recurred. Duplication of the terminal ileum was removed to prevent further recurrence of the intestinal obstruction. She underwent ventriculoatrial shunting 2 weeks after the second operation and was discharged without neurological sequelae.

Для цитирования: Matsuoka Hidenori, Takegami Tetsuro, Maruyama Daisuke, Hamasaki Tomoyuki, Kakita Kiyohito, Mineura Katsuyoshi. Transanal prolapse of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt catheter--case report.. Neurologia medico-chirurgica. 2008. DOI: 10.2176/nmc.48.526.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.