MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1038/sc.2009.165

Медицинская библиотека · Spinal cord · 2009

Pain after paraplegia: a survey in India.

Gupta N, Solomon J, Raja K

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

STUDY

DESIGN

A postal survey.

OBJECTIVE

To ascertain the incidence of pain in individuals with paraplegia in India and to associate it with demographic characteristics.

SETTING

India.

METHOD: The study was done by means of a questionnaire. This questionnaire was mailed to the identified individuals (n=600) on the addresses obtained from the medical records section of hospitals and from various organizations. Data analysis was done by using non-parametric tests of association.

RESULTS

The return rate was 46% (276/600). Fifty-seven percent of individuals complained of pain. Of this, pain in the back and chest ranked the highest (30.1%), followed by pain below the level of lesion (6.9%), pain in the shoulder and upper limb (4.7%) and neck (0.4%). Fifteen percent of individuals complained of pain at multiple sites. We found a significant association of pain with age, duration since injury and ambulation.

CONCLUSION

More than half of the subjects complained of pain in the study. Pain was found to be associated with age, duration since injury and ambulation. As pain has a dramatic effect on a subjects' quality of life, there is a need to evaluate it in detail and treat accordingly with preventive, rehabilitative or surgical procedures.

Для цитирования: Gupta N, Solomon J, Raja K. Pain after paraplegia: a survey in India.. Spinal cord. 2009. DOI: 10.1038/sc.2009.165.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.