Introduction
Paraneoplastic inflammatory syndrome (PIS) is a rare but severe condition associated with solid cancers, with negative prognostic implications. 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 PIS is diagnosed after the exclusion of infection and other causes of inflammation. It is mediated by the release of cytokines, hormones, or other immune-modulating factors by cancer cells. 1 Clinical symptoms include fever, fatigue, night sweats, decreased performance status (PS), weight loss, and cachexia. Biological symptoms include C-reactive protein (CRP) increase, neutrophilia, with occasional leukemoid reactions, thrombocytosis, and inflammatory anemia. 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15
The overproduction of interleukin 6 (IL-6) by solid cancer cells has been reported to be involved in the pathogenesis of these systemic clinical and biological symptoms. 4 , 6 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 IL-6 is a multifunctional cytokine that plays a pivotal role in immune responses, inflammation, and hematopoiesis. 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 Under normal physiological conditions, IL-6 is involved in the acute-phase response to infections and tissue injuries, facilitating the activation and differentiation of B and T cells, as well as the production of acute-phase proteins by the liver. However, in the context of paraneoplastic syndromes, the deregulated IL-6 production by cancer cells yields increased blood concentrations and systemic symptoms of inflammation. 1 , 4 , 6 The persistent elevation of IL-6 in the bloodstream may cause fever, fatigue, weight loss, and cachexia, significantly impacting the patient’s quality of life.
Cancers causing IL-6-mediated PIS are often hematological malignancies, lymphoma, or multiple myeloma. 22 , 23 , 24 Many different solid cancers are also associated with PIS: renal cell carcinomas, 1 , 4 , 6 lung cancers, 1 , 2 sarcomas, 1 , 7 , 10 and others. 1 , 8 , 9 , 10 In these patients, IL-6 and CRP levels are highly correlated and their increase is correlated to a worse progression-free survival and/or in a variety of solid cancers. 1 , 2 , 3 , 16 , 17 , 25
The management of IL-6-mediated PIS requires an efficient anti-neoplastic treatment. The primary strategy is the management of the underlying malignancy, which, if successfully treated, may lead to the resolution of the inflammatory syndrome. Anti-inflammatory agents and corticosteroids may also be used to control inflammation, although their efficacy is inconsistent and often short lasting, while long-term use is associated with significant side-effects. 26 In early studies, monoclonal anti-IL-6 antibodies (Abs) were reported to improve clinical and biological symptoms of PIS in patients with solid and hematological tumors. 6 , 22 , 23 , 24 In case reports, tocilizumab, a monoclonal antibody against the IL-6 receptor (IL-6R), has also been shown to be effective in reducing the inflammatory symptoms and improving the quality of life in affected patients. 27 , 28
We report here a series of 35 patients describing the efficacy of tocilizumab in PIS associated with solid cancers.
Patients and methods
Patients
Patients treated with tocilizumab at Centre Léon Bérard (CLB) since 2019 were included in a retrospective study conducted according to the methodology MR004 of the French National Health authorities. The study was approved in August 2024 under the number R201-004-478. Inclusion criteria were a diagnosis of PIS excluding other causes of systemic inflammation, and the administration of tocilizumab to treat these symptoms. Only patients who agreed to the reuse of their data could be included.
Criteria used for the selection of patients
There is no universally accepted definition of PIS but several characteristics have to be met. The following criteria were used in this study to qualify the PIS of these patients: (i) absence of documented infection, (ii) duration ≥3 weeks, (iii) absence of associated inflammatory or immune condition, (iv) fever >38°C and/or chronic night sweats, and/or weight loss, (v) increased CRP level (without threshold levels).
Clinical and biological data
The data were collected using the CONSORE tool from the electronic patient records of CLB. 29 , 30 , 31 Eighty-five patients were treated with tocilizumab at CLB between 2019 and 2024. Nine were treated for a coronavirus diease-19 pneumonia, 41 received tocilizumab for cytokine release syndrome (CRS) after chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T-cell) therapy, and 35 were treated with tocilizumab for a documented PIS, with paraneoplastic fever and increased CRP levels ( Table 1 ). Symptoms of PIS were considered as severe by the physician, because of an impact on PS (>2), weight loss >10%, and/or persistent fever. Patient characteristics, treatments, and biological results were extracted and checked manually by two researchers (J-YB, PH). Clinical (age, sex, histological type, PS, weight, treatment, etc.) and biological [CRP, polymorphonuclear leukocyte (PMN), platelet, and hemoglobin (Hb)] characteristics of all patients collected at baseline, before, during, and after tocilizumab were extracted, verified, and validated. Baseline plasma IL-6 levels were documented in 13 patients. Survival and follow-up were collected. Table 1 Description of the patients Characteristics n (%) Sex Female 12 (34) Male 23 (66) Age, median (range), years 59 (15-88) Cancer type Sarcoma a 22 (63) DDLPS 10 (28) Lung cancer b 12 (22) Adenocarcinoma 6 (11) Breast cancer 1 (3) Clinical stage before tocilizumab 2 c 6 (17) 4 29 (83) Paraneoplastic fever Yes 34 (97) No 1 (3) PS 1 4 (11) 2 14 (40) 3 12 (34) 4 4 (11) Previous treatments 25 (71) Context of tocilizumab administration Before local treatment 6 (17) Single-agent palliative tocilizumab 6 (17) Combination with CT 17 (44) Combination with IO agents 6 (17) IL-6 levels (pg/ml) 141 (56-680) CRP levels (mg/l) 212 (32-470) PMN count >7000 G/L 26 (74) PLT count >450 G/L 17 (49) Anemia 33 (94) Number of tocilizumab courses 1 23 (66) 2 3 (9) 3 5 (14) 4 3 (9) 25 1 (3) AFH, angiomatoid fibrous histiocytoma; CT, chemotherapy; DDLPS, dedifferentiated liposarcoma; IL-6, interleukin 6; IO, immuno-oncologic; LMS, leiomyosarcoma; MPNST, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors; PLT, platelet, PMN, polymorphonuclear leukocyte; PS, performance status; RMS, rhabdomyosarcoma; UPS, undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma; WDLPS, well-differentiated liposarcoma. a n = 4 epidermoid carcinoma, n = 1 undifferentiated carcinoma, n = 1 sarcomatoid carcinoma. b UPS: n = 3, WDLPS: n = 3, SFT, angiosarcoma, pleomorphic RMS, LMS, AFH, MPNST n = 1 each. c All stage 2 were sarcomas: n = 4 DDLPS, n = 1 UPS and angiosarcoma each.
Table 1
Description of the patients
AFH, angiomatoid fibrous histiocytoma; CT, chemotherapy; DDLPS, dedifferentiated liposarcoma; IL-6, interleukin 6; IO, immuno-oncologic; LMS, leiomyosarcoma; MPNST, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors; PLT, platelet, PMN, polymorphonuclear leukocyte; PS, performance status; RMS, rhabdomyosarcoma; UPS, undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma; WDLPS, well-differentiated liposarcoma.
a n = 4 epidermoid carcinoma, n = 1 undifferentiated carcinoma, n = 1 sarcomatoid carcinoma.
b UPS: n = 3, WDLPS: n = 3, SFT, angiosarcoma, pleomorphic RMS, LMS, AFH, MPNST n = 1 each.
c All stage 2 were sarcomas: n = 4 DDLPS, n = 1 UPS and angiosarcoma each.
| Characteristics | n (%) |
| Sex | |
| Female | 12 (34) |
| Male | 23 (66) |
| Age, median (range), years | 59 (15-88) |
| Cancer type | |
| Sarcoma a | 22 (63) |
| DDLPS | 10 (28) |
| Lung cancer b | 12 (22) |
| Adenocarcinoma | 6 (11) |
| Breast cancer | 1 (3) |
| Clinical stage before tocilizumab | |
| 2 c | 6 (17) |
| 4 | 29 (83) |
| Paraneoplastic fever | |
| Yes | 34 (97) |
| No | 1 (3) |
| PS | |
| 1 | 4 (11) |
| 2 | 14 (40) |
| 3 | 12 (34) |
| 4 | 4 (11) |
| Previous treatments | 25 (71) |
| Context of tocilizumab administration | |
| Before local treatment | 6 (17) |
| Single-agent palliative tocilizumab | 6 (17) |
| Combination with CT | 17 (44) |
| Combination with IO agents | 6 (17) |
| IL-6 levels (pg/ml) | 141 (56-680) |
| CRP levels (mg/l) | 212 (32-470) |
| PMN count >7000 G/L | 26 (74) |
| PLT count >450 G/L | 17 (49) |
| Anemia | 33 (94) |
| Number of tocilizumab courses | |
| 1 | 23 (66) |
| 2 | 3 (9) |
| 3 | 5 (14) |
| 4 | 3 (9) |
| 25 | 1 (3) |
Tocilizumab administration
Tocilizumab was administered intravenously (i.v.) at a dose of 8 mg/kg in a short 60-min i.v. infusion once in 23 patients and every 15 days three times and then monthly in 8 patients. Tocilizumab was given every 4 weeks in four patients.
Ethical approval and health authorities’ approval
The study was approved by the local study committee and by the national authorities according to the MR004 procedure ( https://www.cnil.fr/fr/declaration/methodologie-de-reference-04-recherches-nimpliquant-pas-la-personne-humaine-etudes-et-evaluations-dans-le-domaine-de-la-sante ) in August 2024 (authorization number R201-004-478).
Statistical analysis
The distribution of clinical and biological characteristics was analyzed using the chi-square test, Fisher’s exact test, and Mann–Whitney U test. Survival was plotted from the date of tocilizumab injection to the date of death or to the date of last news if alive at the time of the analysis (August 2024). Survival was plotted according to the Kaplan–Meier method, and groups were compared using the log-rank test. All statistical analyses were carried out using SPSS 23.0 software (IBM, Paris, France).
Results
Patients
From March 2019 to July 2024, 35 patients presenting with a PIS were treated with tocilizumab at CLB ( Table 1 ). All patients had been pretreated with paracetamol and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs with transient and incomplete efficacy on clinical inflammatory symptoms. Symptoms of PIS were considered as severe (PS >2, persistent fever, weight loss >10%) by the physician and were reported at least 3 weeks before tocilizumab in all patients. Sarcoma and lung cancers were the most common cancers in this series. All but one ( n = 34, 97%) patient had paraneoplastic fever and night sweats. One had only night sweats. Twenty-five (60%) lost weight in the past 6 months: 15 (40%) lost >5% and 9 (26%) lost 10% of body weight.
Six (17%) patients, all sarcomas, had localized untreated disease at the date of tocilizumab injection. Six (17%) patients received tocilizumab after progression under standard treatments in the advanced phase without specific cancer therapy as palliative care. Twenty-three (68%) patients received tocilizumab in combination with systemic cancer therapies [chemotherapy n = 17, programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) Ab n = 6]; these 23 patients received tocilizumab before ( n = 21, median 17 days, range 1-118 days), or concomitantly ( n = 2) to systemic cancer therapy. Ten of the 23 patients had received previous systemic therapies.
Biological signs of inflammation were present in all patients. CRP increase (100% of patients, median 212 mg/l), increased PMN counts [ n = 26, 74% of patients, including 20 (57%) and 6 (17%) patients with leukemoid reactions and PMN counts over 10 and 20 G/L, respectively], thrombocytosis [ n = 17 (48%)], and inflammatory anemia [ n = 33 (94%)] ( Table 1 and Figure 1 ). Improvement in the biological parameters was observed in all categories of patients: in previously untreated patients, in patients receiving concomitant systemic therapy, and in patients treated with tocilizumab only in the palliative setting ( Supplementary Figure S1 , available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.104088 ). Increased IL-6 plasma levels were observed in all 13 patients in whom they were measured (median 141 pg/ml, range 58-680 pg/ml). Figure 1 Biological inflammatory syndrome 1-3 weeks after the first injection of tocilizumab. (A) CRP levels (mg/l), (B) PMN counts (G/L), (C) platelet counts (G/L), and (D) hemoglobin level (g/l) before and nadir 1-3 weeks after anti-IL-6. CRP, C-reactive protein; IL-6, interleukin 6; PMN, polymorphonuclear leukocyte.

Impact of tocilizumab on clinical and biological inflammatory syndrome
Tocilizumab was given once in 23 (66%) patients. In 12 patients receiving more than one course, treatment was administered on day (d) 0, d15, and d28 and then monthly in 8 patients, and monthly in 4 patients.
In six sarcoma patients with localized disease, tocilizumab was given to alleviate inflammatory syndrome causing fever and an alteration of PS contraindicating the surgical intervention needed to remove the primary tumor. Three, two, and one patient received one, two, and four courses before definitive surgery, respectively. All were operated and all are alive without progression at the time of the analysis. In advanced cancers, 20 of the 29 patients received only one course of tocilizumab, mostly because of rapid cancer progression.
All but one (97%) patient experienced resolution of fever and night sweats, with occasional body temperature inferior to 36°C. The last patient passed without temperature documentation. Weight was stable 3-4 weeks after tocilizumab in 21 (60%) patients, with 7 (20%) patients losing ≥1 kg. Seven (20%) patients gained weight (≥1 kg) 3-4 weeks after the first tocilizumab injection, including four of the nine (44%) patients who had lost >10% of weight (4/9 versus 3/26, P = 0.03).
All patients experienced a decrease in serum CRP levels after tocilizumab administration (median reduction −94%, range −8% to −99.5%, Wilcoxon P < 0.0001). Sixteen (44%) had normalized (<6 mg/l) CRP levels ( Figure 1 ).
After tocilizumab, 30 (85%) patients had decreased PMN counts (median reduction −4.160 G/L, range −40.050 to +17.200 G/L, Wilcoxon P < 0.0001). Twelve of 26 (46%) patients with increased baseline PMN had normalized PMN counts ( Figure 1 ).
After tocilizumab, 33 (94%) patients had decreased platelet counts (median reduction −192 G/L, range −591 to +177 G/L, Wilcoxon P < 0.0001); 16 of 17 (94%) patients with thrombocytosis had normalized platelet counts ( Figure 1 ). The last patient has no documentation of platelet count after tocilizumab.
After tocilizumab, 27 (77%) patients had increased Hb levels (median Hb increase +17 g/l, range −30 to +48 g/l, Wilcoxon P < 0.0001) transiently ( Figure 1 ). Two patients (6%) had increased Hb levels >120 g/l without red cell transfusion.
An improvement in PS was observed in 11 (31%) patients ( Figure 2 A). Patients with improvement of at least 1 point of PS had more often a normalized serum CRP level after tocilizumab (8/11 versus 8/24, P = 0.03), and, overall, a greater magnitude of reduction of CRP levels (−94.3% ± 1.7% versus 84.7% ± 3.9%, P = 0.042, Figure 2 B and C). Figure 2 PS before and after tocilizumab administration. (A) Changes in PS after tocilizumab administration. (B) Magnitude of CRP level changes after tocilizumab administration in patients with stable and improved PS. (C) Nadir of CRP after tocilizumab administration in patients with stable and improved PS. CRP, C-reactive protein; PS, performance status.

No specific side-effects related to tocilizumab administration 32 were reported, in particular no skin, lung, or mycobacterial infection.
The correction of inflammatory symptoms was transient. Four to six weeks after the last administration of tocilizumab, most patients in whom complete remission was not obtained had recurrence of clinical and biological symptoms in particular CRP increase, comparing CRP levels at 1-3 weeks after the first tocilizumab versus 6 weeks after the last tocilizumab injection ( Figuren 3 A, Wilcoxon P = 0.001). In patients followed sequentially, the nadir of CRP occurred at d7 after tocilizumab injection. CRP increased in some patients after this date, while others had a more prolonged CRP decrease ( Figure 3 B). Figure 3 CRP levels before, during, and after tocilizumab. (A) In all patients: baseline, nadir, and 4-6 weeks after the last injection. (B) In patients with documented CRP levels within 21 days after the first tocilizumab injection. CRP, C-reactive protein; d, day.

Survival
All six sarcoma patients with localized disease were operated for the primary tumor, and all are alive disease free without PIS.
The median survival of patients with PIS in advanced disease was 4 months ( Figure 4 A). For patients with advanced disease, CRP levels above the median of the group (212 mg/l) were associated with a worse survival ( Figure 4 B). In this latter subgroup, the normalization of CRP levels after tocilizumab was associated with a superior though short survival (median 4.3 months versus 0.6 months); this was not observed in the group with baseline CRP lower than the median of the group ( Figure 4 C and D). Figure 4 Survival from the date of tocilizumab treatment. (A) In advanced versus localized patients; (B) in patients with CRP levels above or under the median of the group; (C) in patients with CRP less than the median, with and without tocilizumab treatment; and (D) in patients with CRP higher than the median, with and without tocilizumab treatment.

No detrimental impact on disease progression or death was reported in this retrospective study. The six patients receiving tocilizumab with PD-1/PD-L1 Ab had a median survival of 19 months versus 3 months for those receiving tocilizumab with cytotoxic chemotherapy or best supportive care (BSC) only ( P = not significant, not shown).
Discussion
The objective of the study was to investigate the anti-inflammatory activity of the anti-IL-6R Ab tocilizumab in patients with solid tumors and PIS. The present series is the largest reported to our knowledge addressing the treatment of patients with PIS. It shows the significant therapeutic value of the blockade of IL-6 pathway for patients with PIS caused by solid cancers.
All 35 patients had a severe PIS. This population was frail with 100% presenting paraneoplastic fever, a median PS of 2, recent weight loss, and a major increase in CRP levels. Tocilizumab was an efficient symptomatic treatment for PIS in all 35 patients. Tocilizumab improved clinical symptoms, in particular fever in 97% of patients, but also improved PS in one-third of patients, enabled weight gain in patients with >10% body weight loss, and enabled the application of curative cancer treatments in patients previously contraindicated for curative surgery.
In solid tumors, PIS is rare but associated with a higher risk of progression and death in a large number of series. 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 8 , 9 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 It is a severe and difficult-to-treat condition, whose resolution is obtained mostly when complete remission can be obtained. In this series, all 13 tested patients had increased serum IL-6 levels; CRP was also consistently elevated, with a median level before tocilizumab of 212 mg/l. CRP and IL-6 levels have been reported to be correlated in many series and different cancer types. 3 , 4 , 8 , 9 CRP normalization is a biomarker to assess the activity of anti-IL-6 in vivo , confirming previous case reports and older studies with first generations of anti-IL-6 Ab. 6 , 22 , 24 , 27 , 28
Tocilizumab is an anti-IL-6R Ab developed for the treatment of autoimmune diseases, in particular rheumatological diseases. 33 It is also an active treatment for CRS associated with CAR-T-cell injections. 34 It has been also used in case reports to treat PIS in patients. 27 , 28 Thirty years ago, a mouse monoclonal anti-IL-6 Ab was used to treat hematological cancers and renal cell carcinoma with significant activity on inflammatory symptoms and occasional antitumor activity, but limited duration of activity with the development of anti-mouse Ab. 6 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 35 , 36
Clinically, a resolution of paraneoplastic fever was observed in all 34 documented patients, with weight gain and improvement in PS observed in >30% of patients despite the short duration of treatment. The correction of biological hallmarks of inflammation was observed in all patients. CRP decreased massively in all patients and normalized in 46% of patients. Thrombocytosis was corrected in all 16 documented patients. The monitoring of CRP levels in some patients enabled to measure the activity of anti-IL-6R in this series: with a nadir of CRP levels 7-10 days after tocilizumab, some patients presented a slow increase beyond this date. Indeed, the duration of correction was limited in patients who received only one injection of tocilizumab. In this series, a single injection of tocilizumab was often proposed in the late advanced phase, in six patients receiving BSC only with poor life expectancy. Given the limited duration of CRP normalization after a single injection of tocilizumab, we now propose repeated 2-weekly injections of tocilizumab for patients with PIS who improved partially after a single injection to explore this question, with monitoring of CRP.
Some patients derived less benefit from tocilizumab injection, without PS improvement, and/or absence of normalization of CRP. This also could be related not only to a too short duration of treatment, but also to the possible role of other proinflammatory factors. 1 , 16 When clinical symptoms of PIS, in particular fever, were not recurring, subsequent injections were often postponed. It can be recommended if benefit is observed to administer at d0, d14, and d28 and then monthly injections to obtain a more prolonged improvement in clinical and biological symptoms.
Sarcoma and lung cancer were the most common histological subtypes represented in this series.
In sarcoma, dedifferentiated liposarcoma was the predominant histotype in line with a recent preprint publication 37 , but other sarcoma histotypes (undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, angiosarcoma) were also represented in this series. PIS is observed in a variety of solid cancers, 1 , 4 , 8 , 9 , 16 including renal cell carcinoma, mesothelioma, and colorectal cancer among other cancer types. Anti-IL-6R treatment could be investigated in these tumors as well, noting that anti-IL-6 was successfully used for this purpose in advanced renal cell carcinoma with documented IL-6 production by tumor cells. 4 , 6 , 36
There were three clinical situations where tocilizumab was used in this series.
Firstly, tocilizumab was used in patients with a localized operable disease, here only sarcomas. In those patients in whom PIS precluded surgical intervention, a transient tocilizumab treatment enabled a resolution of fever and improvement in clinical status allowing for surgical resection which enabled the complete resection of the primary tumor in all cases. PIS did not recur after complete surgical removal of the disease.
Secondly, tocilizumab was used in patients with advanced cancers receiving a systemic anticancer treatment, cytotoxic agents, or PD-1/PD-L1 Abs; when PIS deteriorated the clinical condition, a transient administration of tocilizumab enabled to alleviate clinical symptoms in all patients.
Thirdly, tocilizumab was used in patients in the advanced phase receiving only palliative care and no specific treatment. As expected, the life expectancy of the latter group was short.
The survival of the group of patients in the advanced-phase population was short, as expected for patients with a severe PIS. Importantly, in patients with the highest CRP level (above median), those in whom tocilizumab administration normalized CRP had a median survival; the survival was significantly superior to that of the other patients, though still short.
This study has several limitations. It is a retrospective collection of data, though exhaustive in the institution; therefore, the collection of potential adverse events may be imperfect. The duration of tocilizumab administration was variable. The population were heterogeneous in terms of tumor types and clinical situation. Patients were selected on the basis (among other criteria) of CRP increase; together with the limited number of patients tested for IL-6 levels, this limits our capacity to explore the correlation between CRP and IL-6 levels. We are now prospectively collecting these information for the patients candidate for tocilizumab treatment for a diagnosis of PIS. Nevertheless, this is the largest series of patients with PIS caused by a solid tumor treated with an anti-IL-6R Ab to our knowledge. The magnitude of clinical improvement observed in all patients and its capacity to enable curative treatment support the clinical and therapeutic utility of the treatment of PIS in patients with solid cancers.
In conclusion, tocilizumab is an efficient symptomatic treatment for PIS. It improved clinical symptoms, in particular normalized fever, enabled PS improvement in one-third of patients, and enabled curative surgery in patients previously contraindicated for intervention. It is also an interesting palliative treatment in end-stage patients to alleviate symptoms, including fever, fatigue, and cachexia. This approach deserves further exploration in patients with localized or advanced cancers with PIS.
Funding
This work was supported and funded by academic grants, NetSARC+ (INCA and DGOS) and RREPS (INCA and DGOS) , RESOS (INCA and DGOS), LYRICAN+ [grant number INCA-DGOS-INSERM 12563], InterSARC+ (INCA), LabEx DEvweCAN [grant number ANR-10-LABX-0061], EURACAN [grant number EC 739521], SHAPEMED, la Fondation ARC, Infosarcome, Ligue de L’Ain contre le Cancer, and La Ligue contre le Cancer (no grant number).
Disclosure
The authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
References
1 Aguilar-Cazares D. Chavez-Dominguez R. Marroquin-Muciño M. The systemic-level repercussions of cancer-associated inflammation mediators produced in the tumor microenvironment Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 13 2022 929572 10.3389/fendo.2022.929572 PMC9441602 36072935
2 Kanaji N. Watanabe N. Kita N. Paraneoplastic syndromes associated with lung cancer World J Clin Oncol 5 2014 197 223 25114839 10.5306/wjco.v5.i3.197 PMC4127595
3 Shrotriya S. Walsh D. Bennani-Baiti N. Thomas S. Lorton C. C-reactive protein is an important biomarker for prognosis tumor recurrence and treatment response in adult solid tumors: a systematic review PLoS One 10 12 2015 e0143080 10.1371/journal.pone.0143080 PMC4705106 26717416
4 Blay J.Y. Negrier S. Combaret V. Serum level of interleukin 6 as a prognosis factor in metastatic renal cell carcinoma Cancer Res 52 1992 3317 3322 1596890
5 Melhem M.F. Meisler A.I. Saito R. Finley G.G. Hockman H.R. Koski R.A. Cytokines in inflammatory malignant fibrous histiocytoma presenting with leukemoid reaction Blood 82 1993 2038 2044 7691245
6 Blay J.Y. Rossi J.F. Wijdenes J. Role of interleukin-6 in the paraneoplastic inflammatory syndrome associated with renal-cell carcinoma Int J Cancer 72 1997 424 430 9247285 10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(19970729)72:3<424::aid-ijc9>3.0.co;2-r
7 Yamakawa Y. Fujimura M. Hidaka T. Yasoshima K. Saito S. Inflammatory malignant fibrous histiocytoma of the ovary producing interleukin-6: a case report Gynecol Oncol 75 1999 484 489 10600313 10.1006/gyno.1999.5589
8 Sharma R. Zucknick M. London R. Kacevska M. Liddle C. Clarke S.J. Systemic inflammatory response predicts prognosis in patients with advanced-stage colorectal cancer Clin Colorectal Cancer 7 2008 331 337 18794066 10.3816/CCC.2008.n.044
9 Abdul Rahim S.N. Ho G.Y. Coward J.I. The role of interleukin-6 in malignant mesothelioma Transl Lung Cancer Res 4 2015 55 66 25806346 10.3978/j.issn.2218-6751.2014.07.01 PMC4367717
10 Hojo K. Furuta T. Komaki S. Systemic inflammation caused by an intracranial mesenchymal tumor with a EWSR1::CREM fusion presenting associated with IL-6/STAT3 signaling Neuropathology 43 2023 244 251 36328767 10.1111/neup.12877
11 Nakamura T. Asanuma K. Hagi T. Sudo A. C-reactive protein and related predictors in soft tissue sarcoma (Review) Mol Clin Oncol 20 2023 6 38125741 10.3892/mco.2023.2704 PMC10729310
12 Errani C. Traversari M. Cosentino M. The prognostic value of the serum level of C-reactive protein for survival of children with Ewing’s sarcoma Cancers (Basel) 15 2023 1573 36900365 10.3390/cancers15051573 PMC10000755
13 Rebuzzi S.E. Prelaj A. Friedlaender A. Prognostic scores including peripheral blood-derived inflammatory indices in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 179 2022 103806 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2022.103806 36087850
14 Paval D.R. Patton R. McDonald J. Skipworth R.J.E. Gallagher I.J. Laird B.J. Caledonian Cachexia Collaborative. A systematic review examining the relationship between cytokines and cachexia in incurable cancer J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 13 2022 824 838 35080147 10.1002/jcsm.12912 PMC8977958
15 Taniguchi K. Karin M. IL-6 and related cytokines as the critical lynchpins between inflammation and cancer Semin Immunol 26 2014 54 74 24552665 10.1016/j.smim.2014.01.001
16 Lippitz B.E. Cytokine patterns in patients with cancer: a systematic review Lancet Oncol 14 6 2013 e218 e228 23639322 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70582-X
17 Lippitz B.E. Harris R.A. Cytokine patterns in cancer patients: a review of the correlation between interleukin 6 and prognosis Oncoimmunology 5 5 2016 e1093722 10.1080/2162402X.2015.1093722 PMC4910721 27467926
18 Kishimoto T. Akira S. Taga T. Interleukin-6 and its receptor: a paradigm for cytokines Science 258 1992 593 597 1411569 10.1126/science.1411569
19 Hunter C.A. Jones S.A. IL-6 as a keystone cytokine in health and disease Nat Immunol 16 2015 448 457 25898198 10.1038/ni.3153
20 Tanaka T. Kishimoto T. The biology and medical implications of interleukin-6 Cancer Immunol Res 2 2014 288 294 24764575 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-14-0022
21 Tanaka T. Narazaki M. Kishimoto T. Therapeutic targeting of the interleukin-6 receptor Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 52 2012 199 219 21910626 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010611-134715
22 Moreau P. Harousseau J.L. Wijdenes J. Morineau N. Milpied N. Bataille R. A combination of anti-interleukin 6 murine monoclonal antibody with dexamethasone and high-dose melphalan induces high complete response rates in advanced multiple myeloma Br J Haematol 109 3 2000 661 664 10886221 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2000.02093.x
23 Lu Z.Y. Brailly H. Wijdenes J. Bataille R. Rossi J.F. Klein B. Measurement of whole body interleukin-6 (IL-6) production: prediction of the efficacy of anti-IL-6 treatments Blood 86 8 1995 3123 3131 7579407
24 Emilie D. Wijdenes J. Gisselbrecht C. Administration of an anti-interleukin-6 monoclonal antibody to patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and lymphoma: effect on lymphoma growth and on B clinical symptoms Blood 84 8 1994 2472 2479 7919367
25 van der Laan P. van der Graaf W.T.A. van den Broek D. Interleukin-6 in relation to early recurrence in primary, localized soft tissue sarcoma: an addition for existing risk classification systems? Eur J Surg Oncol 50 9 2024 108530 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108530 39083882
26 Diament M.J. Peluffo G.D. Stillitani I. Inhibition of tumor progression and paraneoplastic syndrome development in a murine lung adenocarcinoma by medroxyprogesterone acetate and indomethacin Cancer Invest 24 2006 126 131 16537180 10.1080/07357900500524322
27 Eberst L. Cassier P.A. Brahmi M. Tirode F. Blay J.Y. Tocilizumab for the treatment of paraneoplastic inflammatory syndrome associated with angiomatoid fibrous histiocytoma ESMO Open 5 3 2020 e000756 10.1136/esmoopen-2020-000756 PMC7299035 32546510
28 Hirata H. Tetsumoto S. Kijima T. Favorable responses to tocilizumab in two patients with cancer-related cachexia J Pain Symptom Manage 46 2 2013 e9 e13 23602326 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.01.009
29 Guérin J. Nahid A. Tassy L. Consore: a powerful federated data mining tool driving a French research network to accelerate cancer research Int J Environ Res Public Health 21 2024 189 38397680 10.3390/ijerph21020189 PMC10887639
30 Heudel P. Crochet H. Durand T. Zrounba P. Blay J.Y. From data strategy to implementation to advance cancer research and cancer care: a French comprehensive cancer center experience PLOS Digit Health 2 12 2023 e0000415 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000415 PMC10729983 38113207
31 Heudel P.E. Fervers B. Durand T. Second primary cancers: a retrospective analysis of real world data using the enhanced medical research engine ConSoRe in a French comprehensive cancer center Int J Clin Oncol 26 2021 1793 1804 34091824 10.1007/s10147-021-01963-3
32 Campbell L. Chen C. Bhagat S.S. Parker R.A. Östör A.J. Risk of adverse events including serious infections in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with tocilizumab: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Rheumatology (Oxford) 50 3 2011 552 562 21078627 10.1093/rheumatology/keq343
33 Choy E.H. De Benedetti F. Takeuchi T. Hashizume M. John M.R. Kishimoto T. Translating IL-6 biology into effective treatments Nat Rev Rheumatol 16 2020 335 345 32327746 10.1038/s41584-020-0419-z PMC7178926
34 Barrett D. IL-6 blockade in cytokine storm syndromes Adv Exp Med Biol 1448 2024 565 572 39117839 10.1007/978-3-031-59815-9_37
35 Legouffe E. Liautard J. Gaillard J.P. Human anti-mouse antibody response to the injection of murine monoclonal antibodies against IL-6 Clin Exp Immunol 98 1994 323 329 7955540 10.1111/j.1365-2249.1994.tb06145.x PMC1534395
36 Blay J.Y. Schemann S. Favrot M.C. Local production of interleukin 6 by renal adenocarcinoma in vivo J Natl Cancer Inst 86 1994 238 10.1093/jnci/86.3.238 8283498
37 Zewdu A. Braggio D. Lopez G. Blockade of interleukin-6 (IL-6) signaling in dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS) decreases mouse double minute 2 (MDM2) oncogenicity via alternative splicing bioRxiv 2024 10.1101/2024.02.21.581397 PMC12443315 40961077
Supplementary data
Supplementary Figure 1