MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.23736/s2724-606x.22.05068-0

Медицинская библиотека · Minerva obstetrics and gynecology · 2022

Neurological morbidity in monochorionic twins with selective fetal growth restriction.

Paiva Tiemi M, Santana Eduardo F, Casati Murilo F, Araujo Júnior Edward

СтатьяОбзорTwin StudyПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The increased risks of various obstetric, maternal and fetal comorbidities of monochorionic twin pregnancies are widely known. However, despite its high prevalence and significance, the assessment of neurological morbidity as more commonly in selective fetal growth restriction (sFGR) is concerned with more health care. This literature review aims to provide more information about such an assessment. To this end, retrospective cases of sFGR were studied in monochorionic twins, already diagnosed, classified and who had the recommended management, published between 2001 and 2018 in 17 scientific articles. In the assessment of fetal mortality, the highest risk of death of the restricted fetus was found in type 3 of sFGR, while type 2 sFGR was responsible for the highest death rates of both fetuses and also the lowest mean gestational age at delivery, 30.9 weeks. Regarding neurological morbidity, however, studies have shown a higher risk of brain damage in the habitually growing twin compared to the restricted one in the case of sFGR. This may be due to prematurity or intermittent diastolic flow on Doppler in type 2 and 3 of sFGR, however, statements about its pathophysiology still lack further studies.

Для цитирования: Paiva Tiemi M, Santana Eduardo F, Casati Murilo F, Araujo Júnior Edward. Neurological morbidity in monochorionic twins with selective fetal growth restriction.. Minerva obstetrics and gynecology. 2022. DOI: 10.23736/s2724-606x.22.05068-0.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.