MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/15438627.2025.2509539

Медицинская библиотека · Research in sports medicine (Print) · 2025

Repetitive head impact exposure in collegiate wrestling practices using instrumented mouthguard technology.

Zimmerman Claudia, Le Flao Enora, Cecchi Nicholas J, Towns Jessica A, Sami Sohrab, Zeineh Michael, Grant Gerald, Camarillo David B

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Collegiate wrestling presents a higher risk of concussion than American football. However, there is limited research on repetitive head impact exposure in wrestling, and how it compares to football is unknown. Therefore, this study explores repetitive head impacts in Division 1 collegiate wrestlers (n = 11, age = 20 ± 2 years, 125-285 lbs) during the 2019-2020 wrestling season. Using an instrumented mouthguard, we examined impact numbers and head kinematics, including linear acceleration, angular velocity, and angular acceleration. Of the 246 true positive impacts identified, 60% were head-to-body, 30.1% head-to-head, and 9.9% head-to-ground. Although head-to-ground impacts demonstrated higher magnitudes, differences were not significant. The median PLA was 39.89 g, which is higher than previous reports of head impacts in football. This study provides insights for future wrestling research and the development of safety interventions, such as protective headgear or specialized training exercises, to reduce risks of brain trauma for wrestlers.

Для цитирования: Zimmerman Claudia, Le Flao Enora, Cecchi Nicholas J, Towns Jessica A, Sami Sohrab, Zeineh Michael, Grant Gerald, Camarillo David B. Repetitive head impact exposure in collegiate wrestling practices using instrumented mouthguard technology.. Research in sports medicine (Print). 2025. DOI: 10.1080/15438627.2025.2509539.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.