BMC public health · 2026
Application of health belief model (HBM) in health sciences and medical researches: systematic review on African and Asian countries.
СтатьяСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tolera Sina Temesgen, Zerihun Ebisa, Hunduma Gari, Letta Shiferaw
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The Health Belief Model (HBM) is a widely used psychological framework for explaining and predicting individual's health related attitudes, belief, and behaviors. Although the model has been applied across various fields of health and medical sciences, the extent of its global use, particularly across African and Asian countries has not been well documented.
OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aimed to assess the application of HBM in health sciences and medical research conducted between 2010 and 2025 in Africa and Asian countries.
METHODS: The review followed the updated Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Searches were conducted using keywords "Health Belief Model" combined with Boolean operators (AND, OR) across major databases, including PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library and PsycINFO. Eligible studies included peer-reviewed research articles applying the HBM within African and Asian contexts.
RESULT: From a total of 1,421 identified records, 77 studies met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 61% (n = 47) were conducted in Africa countries and 39% (n = 30) in Asian countries. Most studies (64.94%) employed cross-sectional quantitative design, while 12% used mixed-methods approaches. Random controlled trial account for 9.11% of studies, quasi-experimental design for 7%, and qualitative approaches (including focus groups and in-depth interviews) for 6%. Overall, 85.71% of the studies applied all core components of HBM. Fifteen studies examined COVID-19 vaccine acceptance, nine focused on HIV/AIDS testing, counseling and prevention, and eleven studies explored non-communicable diseases prevention. Additionally, six studies assessed women's adherence to breast cancer screening, and four studies examined cervical cancer screening behaviours using HBM.
CONCLUSION: A current systematic review demonstrates that the HBM remain a valuable framework for understanding and influencing health behaviors across diverse settings. Its application in Africa and Asian research highlights its usefulness in guiding targeted interventions that address perceived susceptibility, severity, benefits, barriers, and cues to action, ultimately contributing to improved health outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aimed to assess the application of HBM in health sciences and medical research conducted between 2010 and 2025 in Africa and Asian countries.
METHODS: The review followed the updated Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Searches were conducted using keywords "Health Belief Model" combined with Boolean operators (AND, OR) across major databases, including PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library and PsycINFO. Eligible studies included peer-reviewed research articles applying the HBM within African and Asian contexts.
RESULT: From a total of 1,421 identified records, 77 studies met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 61% (n = 47) were conducted in Africa countries and 39% (n = 30) in Asian countries. Most studies (64.94%) employed cross-sectional quantitative design, while 12% used mixed-methods approaches. Random controlled trial account for 9.11% of studies, quasi-experimental design for 7%, and qualitative approaches (including focus groups and in-depth interviews) for 6%. Overall, 85.71% of the studies applied all core components of HBM. Fifteen studies examined COVID-19 vaccine acceptance, nine focused on HIV/AIDS testing, counseling and prevention, and eleven studies explored non-communicable diseases prevention. Additionally, six studies assessed women's adherence to breast cancer screening, and four studies examined cervical cancer screening behaviours using HBM.
CONCLUSION: A current systematic review demonstrates that the HBM remain a valuable framework for understanding and influencing health behaviors across diverse settings. Its application in Africa and Asian research highlights its usefulness in guiding targeted interventions that address perceived susceptibility, severity, benefits, barriers, and cues to action, ultimately contributing to improved health outcomes.