Accuracy of Dynamic Computer-Assisted Surgery for Pterygoid Implant Placement in Fully and Partially Edentulous Maxillae: A Retrospective Comparative Study.

Background and

Objectives

The rehabilitation of the atrophic posterior maxilla with pterygoid implant presents a significant challenge due to complex regional anatomy and limited visual access. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of a dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery system (dCAIS) for pterygoid implant placement in fully and partially edentulous maxillae using radiographic marker registration (RMR) and markerless tracing registration (MTR), respectively. Materials and

Methods

Forty pterygoid implants were retrospectively evaluated in 40 patients, divided into two groups: fully edentulous (n = 20) and partially edentulous (n = 20). Implant placement was performed using a dynamic navigation system (dCAIS), utilizing either bone-anchored mini-screws or tooth-surface tracing as reference points. Accuracy was assessed by superimposing preoperative plans with postoperative cone beam computer tomography (CBCT) scans. Coronal, apical, and angular deviations were measured and analyzed using the Data Science Workbench (version 14). The level of statistical significance was set at α = 0.05 (two-tailed).

Results

The mean deviations for fully and partially edentulous maxillae measured 1.24 ± 0.27 mm and 1.40 ± 0.27 mm at the coronal level (p = 0.065), 1.30 ± 0.49 mm and 1.30 ± 0.54 at the apical level (p = 0.995), and 0.72 ± 0.38° and 0.82 ± 0.43° in angular deviation (p = 0.560), respectively. No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups. Notably, mean angular deviation was remarkably low (<1°) in both groups.

Conclusions

No statistically significant between-group differences in accuracy were detected in coronal, apical, and angular deviations between the markerless tracing registration method in partially edentulous patients and the bone-anchored radiographic marker registration method in fully edentulous patients.