Journal of hypertension · 1995
A comparison between the haemodynamic effects of oral nifedipine and intravenous dihydralazine in patients with severe pre-eclampsia.
Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеКонтролируемое клиническое исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Visser W, Wallenburg H C
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of a single oral dose of nifedipine with those of intravenous dihydralazine on central haemodynamics in pregnant women with severe pre-eclampsia.
DESIGN: A prospective comparative study.
SETTING: The High Risk Obstetric Unit, University Hospital Rotterdam Dijkzigt, Rotterdam.
SUBJECTS: Twenty patients with severe pre-eclampsia between 27 and 35 weeks gestation with normal cardiac filling pressures and without fetal distress.
INTERVENTIONS: A pulmonary artery thermodilution catheter and a radial artery line were placed. Ten patients chewed a 10-mg capsule of nifedipine and 10 patients received dihydralazine by intravenous infusion at a rate of 1-3 mg/h. Arterial pressures, heart rate, cardiac output and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure were determined before and after drug administration. Fetal condition was continuously monitored by cardiotocography.
RESULTS: The reduction in arterial blood pressure obtained with both drugs was similar, and was associated with a similar rise in heart rate and cardiac output and a similar reduction in systemic vascular resistance. Pulmonary capillary wedge pressures decreased significantly less with nifedipine than with dihydralazine. Signs of fetal distress occurred in none of the nifedipine-treated patients, but in five of the patients treated with dihydralazine.
CONCLUSION: From the haemodynamic viewpoint nifedipine seems to be a useful agent in the treatment of hypertensive emergencies in pregnancy.
DESIGN: A prospective comparative study.
SETTING: The High Risk Obstetric Unit, University Hospital Rotterdam Dijkzigt, Rotterdam.
SUBJECTS: Twenty patients with severe pre-eclampsia between 27 and 35 weeks gestation with normal cardiac filling pressures and without fetal distress.
INTERVENTIONS: A pulmonary artery thermodilution catheter and a radial artery line were placed. Ten patients chewed a 10-mg capsule of nifedipine and 10 patients received dihydralazine by intravenous infusion at a rate of 1-3 mg/h. Arterial pressures, heart rate, cardiac output and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure were determined before and after drug administration. Fetal condition was continuously monitored by cardiotocography.
RESULTS: The reduction in arterial blood pressure obtained with both drugs was similar, and was associated with a similar rise in heart rate and cardiac output and a similar reduction in systemic vascular resistance. Pulmonary capillary wedge pressures decreased significantly less with nifedipine than with dihydralazine. Signs of fetal distress occurred in none of the nifedipine-treated patients, but in five of the patients treated with dihydralazine.
CONCLUSION: From the haemodynamic viewpoint nifedipine seems to be a useful agent in the treatment of hypertensive emergencies in pregnancy.