Radiofrequency catheter ablation of accessory pathways in patients with Ebstein's anomaly: At 8 years of follow-up.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Data regarding long-term follow-up of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) of accessory pathways (APs) in patients with Ebstein's anomaly (EA) are limited. The procedures are challenging due to multiple or wide APs.
METHODS
Analysis was performed on clinical and periprocedural data of patients with EA referred to the centre in order to perform catheter ablation of AP. The group consisted of 22 patients (female 40.9%, mean age 33.6 ± 19.1 years). The follow-up utilized electrocardiogram and Holter monitoring.
RESULTS
Twenty-two patients had 33 accessory pathways (8 patients had multiple APs, 11 patients broad AP). Twenty-nine different arrhythmias were ablated: 20 orthodromic atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia (O-AVRT), 5 antidromic atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia (A-AVRT), 3 slow/ fast atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (s/f AVNRT) and 1 cavotricuspid-isthmus-dependent atrial flutter (CTI-AFL). In 3 (13.6%) patients multiple ablation targets for RFCA ablation were observed. The acute procedural success rate after the first RFCA performed was: 100% for AVNRT, 77.3% for APs and 50.0% for CTI-AFL ablation. Follow-up (mean 95.7 ± 49.8 months) was completed in 86.4% of patients. One patient had paroxysmal atrial fibrillation not targeted during ablation. One patient died due to heart failure 12 years after RFCA. Three patients who underwent RFCA of accessory pathways in the mid-1990s were lost in follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS
Radiofrequency ablation in patients with EA is challenging but safe and have a high short-term as well as long-term success rate.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.