Nurse education today · 2019
Effectiveness of three-dimensional visualisation on undergraduate nursing and midwifery students' knowledge and achievement in pharmacology: A mixed methods study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hanson Julie, Andersen Patrea, Dunn Peter K
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Historically nursing and midwifery students have reported difficulty understanding the concept-based science underpinning the interactions between drugs and their targets. This knowledge is crucial for the administration and monitoring of the therapeutic and adverse effects of medications. Immersive three-dimensional technology is reported to enhance understanding of complex scientific concepts but the physical effects of motion sickness may limit its use.
OBJECTIVES: This project compared the effectiveness of three-dimensional immersive visualisation technology with two-dimensional visualisation technology as a teaching method to improve student understanding of a pharmacological concept, and to assess levels of student discomfort and satisfaction associated with the experience.
DESIGN: Traditional lecture content and presentation about drug-receptor binding was followed by exposure to either a two- or three-dimensional artifact visualising β-adrenoceptor binding. Two student groups were compared by type of exposure: Group 1 watched the artifact via a three-dimensional immersive facility and Group 2 on a wide, two-dimensional screen.
SETTINGS: School of Nursing and Midwifery in a regional university in Southeast Queensland, Australia.
PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred and two second year undergraduate nursing and midwifery students.
METHODS: The study used mixed methods methodology. Pre- and post- testing of student knowledge was collected using five multiple-choice questions. A post-intervention survey elicited students' self-assessed perceptions of discomfort and satisfaction with the learning experience.
RESULTS: The three-dimensional immersive learning experience was comparable to the two-dimensional experience in terms of satisfaction and comfort but resulted in statistically significant improvements in post-test scores.
CONCLUSIONS: The three-dimensional experience improved understanding when compared to two-dimensional viewing, satisfied students leaning needs, and caused minimal discomfort. The results are encouraging in terms of using three-dimensional technology to enhance student knowledge of pharmacological concepts necessary for competency in medication management.
OBJECTIVES: This project compared the effectiveness of three-dimensional immersive visualisation technology with two-dimensional visualisation technology as a teaching method to improve student understanding of a pharmacological concept, and to assess levels of student discomfort and satisfaction associated with the experience.
DESIGN: Traditional lecture content and presentation about drug-receptor binding was followed by exposure to either a two- or three-dimensional artifact visualising β-adrenoceptor binding. Two student groups were compared by type of exposure: Group 1 watched the artifact via a three-dimensional immersive facility and Group 2 on a wide, two-dimensional screen.
SETTINGS: School of Nursing and Midwifery in a regional university in Southeast Queensland, Australia.
PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred and two second year undergraduate nursing and midwifery students.
METHODS: The study used mixed methods methodology. Pre- and post- testing of student knowledge was collected using five multiple-choice questions. A post-intervention survey elicited students' self-assessed perceptions of discomfort and satisfaction with the learning experience.
RESULTS: The three-dimensional immersive learning experience was comparable to the two-dimensional experience in terms of satisfaction and comfort but resulted in statistically significant improvements in post-test scores.
CONCLUSIONS: The three-dimensional experience improved understanding when compared to two-dimensional viewing, satisfied students leaning needs, and caused minimal discomfort. The results are encouraging in terms of using three-dimensional technology to enhance student knowledge of pharmacological concepts necessary for competency in medication management.