MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Emergency (Tehran, Iran) · 2018

Performance of Local Anesthesia with Lidocaine among Opium Addicts and Non-Addicts; a Case Control Study.

Majidi Alireza, Shahhosseini Tala, Mahmoudi Sadrolla

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Compared to ordinary people, addicts usually have a lower pain threshold. The current work attempts to compare the performance of local analgesia with lidocaine among opium addicts and non-addicts.

METHODS

In this case-control study, opium addicts and healthy patients with skin laceration referring to emergency departments of two educational hospitals were compared regarding the response to local anesthesia with lidocaine, as well as side effects.

RESULTS

197 cases with the mean age of 43.44 ± 20.12 years were studied (72.1% male). 98 (49.8%) cases were addicts and 99 (50.2%) were healthy people. Two groups were similar regarding age (p = 0.281), sex (p = 0.666), and wound size (p = 0.272). The amount of pain reduction 5 (df =1.5, F=0.38, p = 0.88) and 10 (df =1.5, F=0.58, p = 0.72) minutes after lidocaine injection was not different between the groups. Subgroup analysis based on sex and age of patient did not show any differences between the groups (p > 0.1 for all analysis). The mean duration of analgesia was 16.4 ± 5.37 minutes in addicts and 16.95±1.79 in control group (p = 0.334).

CONCLUSION

Lidocaine, as a commonly used local anesthetic agents, does not show different effects in addicts and non-addicts in repairing skin laceration.

Для цитирования: Majidi Alireza, Shahhosseini Tala, Mahmoudi Sadrolla. Performance of Local Anesthesia with Lidocaine among Opium Addicts and Non-Addicts; a Case Control Study.. Emergency (Tehran, Iran). 2018.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.