Venous Thrombotic and Thromboembolic Considerations in Stroke: An Expert Meeting Report on Future Directions for Clinical Trials.

BACKGROUND

Venous thrombosis and venous thromboembolism (VTE) are important causes and complications of stroke. They may complicate acute stroke as deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism (DVT/PE), contribute causally to ischemic stroke through paradoxical embolism from a patent foramen ovale (PFO), or present directly as cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT). Despite shared pathophysiological features and overlapping antithrombotic strategies, these conditions are typically considered separately, fragmenting evidence and limiting the exchange of concepts.

PURPOSE: We therefore convened experts across both stroke neurology and thrombosis medicine fields to examine these conditions under a unifying venous theme and define priorities for future clinical trials.

METHODS

Thirty-two stroke and thrombosis clinicians and researchers identified research priorities across three domains: prevention of VTE after stroke, secondary prevention after PFO-related stroke, and acute and long-term management of CVT. Structured discussions were guided by the PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) framework, followed by a Delphi survey to establish consensus. Priority questions centered on the balance between thrombosis prevention and bleeding risk and the optimal timing, duration, and choice of DVT/PE prophylaxis after stroke; the optimal antithrombotic strategy for patients awaiting or forgoing PFO closure; and, for CVT, the role of endovascular therapy in severe disease and the optimal duration of secondary prevention (Graphical Abstract). Across domains, the group prioritized pragmatic and platform trial designs, integration with international registries to address the rarity of CVT, and patient-oriented outcomes that extend beyond functional recovery.

CONCLUSIONS

By considering these venous conditions together and bridging stroke and thrombosis disciplines, this work defines priority questions to address persistent evidence gaps, harmonize practice, and improve patient-centered outcomes.