Does intraoperative cyst rupture of malignant cystic renal masses really have no negative impact on oncologic outcomes?

BACKGROUND

To assess the impact of malignant cystic renal masses (CRM) rupture on oncologic outcomes.

METHODS

The study included 406 cases with partial nephrectomy (PN) and 17 cases with cyst decortication confirmed as malignant CRM by pathology. Recurrence-free survival (RFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Cox regression was used to identify risk factors associated with RFS, MFS, CSS, and OS. Logistic regression was performed to explore predictors of rupture.

RESULTS

Tumor rupture occurred in 32 of 406 cases (7.9%). With median follow-up of 43 months, 4 (12.5%) and 5 (1.3%) cases experienced recurrence in rupture and non-rupture group, respectively (P = 0.003). Estimated RFS, MFS, and CSS were shorter in cyst ruptured (CR) group than non-ruptured (nonCR) cases (P < 0.001; P = 0.001; P < 0.001). Cox regression analysis indicated that CR was an independent prognostic factor for RFS (HR = 7.354; 95% CI = 1.839-29.413; P = 0.005), MFS (HR = 8.069; 95% CI = 1.804-36.095; P = 0.006), and CSS (HR = 9.643; 95% CI = 2.183-42.599; P = 0.003). Multivariable logistic regression showed that Bosniak IV was a protective factor for CR (OR = 0.065; 95% CI = 0.018-0.239; P < 0.001). However, compared to Bosniak III and I-IIF, Bosniak IV CRMs showed higher rate of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) (76.8% vs 36.5% vs 81.4%) (P < 0.001) and lower rate of Fuhrman I staging (11.2% vs 66.7% vs 7.4%) (P < 0.001). Therefore, in ruptured cases, the recurrence rate was higher in CRM with Bosniak IV (50%, 2/4) than Bosniak I-III (4.4%, 2/45) (P = 0.029).

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative malignant CRM rupture had negative impacts on oncologic outcomes. Bosniak IV was more aggressive than Bosniak I-III and had a higher risk of recurrence after rupture. However, Bosniak IV had a lower risk of rupture, which could weaken even cover-up of the true effect of tumor rupture on oncologic outcomes.