MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jflm.2025.102889

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of forensic and legal medicine · 2025

Investigative interviews with individuals who perpetrated sex crimes: A scoping review.

Sousa Marta, Gouveia Cláudia, de Castro-Rodrigues Andreia, Caridade Sónia, Cunha Olga

СтатьяScoping ReviewПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Sex crimes (CS) are a global public health problem with profound negative consequences for victims, their families, and society. The perpetrator's testimony is crucial for case outcomes because sexual offenses are frequently underreported, often due to limited evidence and lack of victim testimonies. Therefore, perpetrator investigative interviews play a decisive role in criminal investigations. The aim of this scoping review is to identify and describe evidence-based investigative interview techniques for gathering testimony from SC perpetrators using a structured methodology. Studies were identified through manual reference checking and in five electronic databases: Scopus, B-On, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and PubMed. Eight studies met the inclusion criteria. Most of the studies focused on rape and child sexual abuse. Five studies presented interview protocols, while three focused on interview techniques that interviewers should employ to elicit more information. It was possible to conclude that both the presented interviews and the techniques share a similar general structure. Clinical, forensic, and criminal implications are elaborated.

Для цитирования: Sousa Marta, Gouveia Cláudia, de Castro-Rodrigues Andreia, Caridade Sónia, Cunha Olga. Investigative interviews with individuals who perpetrated sex crimes: A scoping review.. Journal of forensic and legal medicine. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jflm.2025.102889.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.