MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1023/a:1021202604049

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2003

A randomized double-blind study to compare the effectiveness of three different doses of lignocaine used in paracervical block during oocyte retrieval.

Ng Ernest Hung Yu, Miao Benyu, Ho Pak Chung

Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To compare the effectiveness of three different doses of lignocaine used in paracervical block (PCB) during transvaginal ultrasound-guided oocyte retrieval (TUGOR)

METHODS

In this double-blind study, 153 patients undergoing TUGOR in their first in vitro fertilization cycle were randomized to receive 50, 100, and 150 mg of lignocaine in PCB. Pain levels were measured by a 100-mm linear visual analogue scale (0 = none to 100 = intolerable).

RESULTS

No differences were seen in the demographic data, the ovarian responses, the duration of TUGOR, and the number of follicles punctured. Vaginal and abdominal pain levels during TUGOR and 4 h after TUGOR were not significantly different among the three groups The median vaginal and abdominal pain levels during the retrieval were 22.0-24.0 and 30.0-32.0 respectively.

CONCLUSION

The use of 50 mg of lignocaine is recommended in PCB because of the lack of improvement in pain relief on higher doses and potential dose-related risks.

Для цитирования: Ng Ernest Hung Yu, Miao Benyu, Ho Pak Chung. A randomized double-blind study to compare the effectiveness of three different doses of lignocaine used in paracervical block during oocyte retrieval.. Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics. 2003. DOI: 10.1023/a:1021202604049.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.