MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.11604/pamj.2017.26.55.10647

Медицинская библиотека · The Pan African medical journal · 2017

Our experience in two cases of type IV laryngotracheoesophageal cleft (LTEC) with a diagnosis of antenatal esophageal atresia.

Sonmez Kaan, Karabulut Ramazan, Turkyilmaz Zafer, Turkyilmaz Canan, Isik Berrin, Eryilmaz Sibel, Seref Kıvanc, Ozcan Ebru, Hosgoren Gul Meral, Basaklar Abdullah Can

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Laryngotracheoesophageal clefts (LTECs) are rare congenital defects that are often accompanied by additional anomalies. The major issues in the treatment of these patients are intraoperative exposure insufficiency, technical difficulty of the operation, and anesthesia problems originating from the respiratory tract. Problems originating from mechanical ventilation and respiratory tract, eating disorders and relapse of fistula are among the problems encountered following surgery. Most of the time, concomitant additional anomalies also worsen the clinical picture. It was our aim with these case reports to report our experience in two cases with Type IV LTEC ranging from the inoperable type IV LTEC due to additional anomalies mounted up to severe respiratory distress to the carina that we operated on with a single stage anterior cervicothoracic approach on its fifth day on life.

Для цитирования: Sonmez Kaan, Karabulut Ramazan, Turkyilmaz Zafer, Turkyilmaz Canan, Isik Berrin, Eryilmaz Sibel, Seref Kıvanc, Ozcan Ebru, Hosgoren Gul Meral, Basaklar Abdullah Can. Our experience in two cases of type IV laryngotracheoesophageal cleft (LTEC) with a diagnosis of antenatal esophageal atresia.. The Pan African medical journal. 2017. DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2017.26.55.10647.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.