MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2147/oaem.s352865

Медицинская библиотека · Open access emergency medicine : OAEM · 2022

Ischemic Stroke Following Calloselasma rhodostoma Snakebite: A Rare Case Report.

Pinzon Rizaldy Taslim, Antonius Radian Adhiputra, Veronica Vanessa

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Ischemic stroke following a snakebite is a rare case. Snake venom consists of multiple components which can cause various symptoms and consequences. We report a case of ischemic stroke following Calloselasma rhodostoma snakebite, and this study was the first to report a case of ischemic stroke after snakebite in Indonesia.

CASE PRESENTATION: A 72-year-old Mongoloid male presented with a history of snakebite one day before hospital admission with a swollen right lower leg with no history of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, or heart disease. The patient was conscious. His temperature was 36.5°C, pulse rate was 90 beats per minute, respiration rate was 30 breaths per minute, and blood pressure was 162/109 mmHg. The neurological examination showed left-side weakness and headache, with blood laboratory results showing prolonged prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), leucocytosis, thrombocytopenia, and low haemoglobin. A computerized tomogram (CT) scan of the brain was taken, which revealed a sign of infarct in the pericallosal of the right lateral periventricular anterior horn.

CONCLUSION

Although ischemic stroke following a snakebite is uncommon, it must be considered and monitored.

Для цитирования: Pinzon Rizaldy Taslim, Antonius Radian Adhiputra, Veronica Vanessa. Ischemic Stroke Following Calloselasma rhodostoma Snakebite: A Rare Case Report.. Open access emergency medicine : OAEM. 2022. DOI: 10.2147/oaem.s352865.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.