MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2350/06-03-0063.1

Медицинская библиотека · Pediatric and developmental pathology : the official journal of the Society for Pediatric Pathology and the Paediatric Pathology Society · 2007

Case report of unilateral clefting: is sonic hedgehog to blame?

Delaney Meghan, Boyd Theonia K

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

We describe the autopsy of a chromosomally normal multiple-anomaly fetus with left side-restricted malformations, terminated after routine screening ultrasound. Autopsy findings were remarkable for severe left-sided craniofacial malformations including a cleft left frontal calavarial bone and an oblique facial cleft. Internal examination showed multiple left-sided malformations including severe left ventricular hypoplasia and interrupted aortic arch. A hypoplastic left lung, an accessory spleen, and an absent left kidney and left ureter were also discovered. Some features of the Smith-Lemli-Opitz Syndrome (SLOS) are found in this fetus, yet the occurrence of left side-restricted anomalies indicates that developmental mechanisms responsible for body laterality are involved. Potential mechanisms leading to this constellation of anomalies include a ciliary defect, side-restricted chromosomal mosaicism, or a teratogenic insult, affecting developmental morphogens, including sonic hedgehog. The sonic hedgehog pathway is important in the molecular mechanisms underlying SLOS and in laterality development in the early embryo.

Для цитирования: Delaney Meghan, Boyd Theonia K. Case report of unilateral clefting: is sonic hedgehog to blame?. Pediatric and developmental pathology : the official journal of the Society for Pediatric Pathology and the Paediatric Pathology Society. 2007. DOI: 10.2350/06-03-0063.1.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.