m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
Journal of oncology pharmacy practice : official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners · 2025

Comparison of dose rounding and drug vial optimization for reducing anticancer drug waste.

СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Harada Tomohiko, Usami Eiseki, Aso Takuya, Yokoyama Natsumi, Imanishi Yukari, Suzuki Isao, Moriya Akihiro, Asano Hiroki, Go Makiko, Kimura Michio, Noguchi Yoshihiro, Yoshimura Tomoaki

Аннотация

Introduction: Numerous injectable anticancer drugs are administered at varying doses based on the body surface area and weight of the patients, often resulting in a certain volume of residual medication. Several anticancer drugs are expensive, thus, their increased use has led to a corresponding increase in drug waste and healthcare costs. Two potential solutions to this issue include drug vial optimization (DVO) and dose rounding (DR). However, DR has rarely been implemented in Japan. Here, we evaluated DVO and DR to assess whether DR could be a viable strategy to reduce the number of anticancer drugs discarded and minimize drug-related costs in Japan. Methods: Patients who received bevacizumab, ramucirumab, gemcitabine, or levofolinate between January and December 2023 at Kanagawa Prefectural Ashigarakami Hospital (Ashigarakami) and Ogaki Municipal Hospital (Ogaki) were included in this study. Actual quantities used for each anticancer drug were extracted from electronic medical records, and the quantities used of drugs during the application of DVO and DR were calculated. Based on these findings, we estimated the reduction in drug waste and the associated cost savings for DVO and DR. Results: DR was more effective than DVO in minimizing the waste of drugs, with 0% waste for gemcitabine at Ogaki and 0% waste for levofolinate at both institutions. Conclusion: Compared with DVO, DR is not influenced by the number of patients treated or the volume of anticancer drugs administered, making it feasible for implementation across a wide range of institutions and a highly effective strategy for minimizing waste. DR should be advocated as a key approach for reducing drug costs in Japan in the future.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

ИП Урсолов Владлен Сергеевич

ИНН 500118482352 · ОГРНИП 314500117700049

Реквизиты и контакты